2203190100Sa WHO CONTROLS THE PRESENT CONTROLS THE PAST; AND WHO CONTROLS THE PAST CONTROLS THE FUTURE; AND WHO CONTROLS THE FUTURE CONTROLS THE PRESENT -- OR SHOULD I JUST SAY ‘WHO CONTROLS’?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” ~ George Orwell With the exception that: ‘Who controls the future can gradually gain control of the present’ ALSO! It’s rather like a ‘self fulfilling prophesy’ when the circle is closed isn’t it?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Reminds me of the age old lyric: “Will the cycle go (or was it ‘be&rsquo unbroken, by-and-by LORD by-and by.” Which leaves me to wonder why he ( George Orwell) didn’t close the cycle with his famous statement quoted herein above? I mean that for someone to control the future narrative they most certainly have control of the present as well – do they not? So, therefore, the real power is held by who controls the politically correct narrative to be accepted in the future – or am I wrong? And what is CRT (Critical Race Theory) if not establishing that control over that future accepted politically correct narrative now in the present – it’s playing ‘The Long Game’ as I’ve heard it termed? The same ‘Long Game’ that the Communist Chinese are famous for playing – is it not? Pardon me, but I just have a little trouble believing that he (Orwell) would intentionally not close his CYCLE of POWER without there being a good reason – unless even he (George Orwell) couldn’t envision the veracious covetousness for POWER socialist totalitarians are actually capable of?

Power is a (even the) most potent narcotic none to humankind – it was used to seduced Eve did it not? The covetousness for power I mean?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Genesis 3: 2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. 4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. (kjv)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The founding fathers of the United States of America wisely saw the ABSOLUTE NEED for a superior entity above man’s government(s) in order for real liberty to be the birth right each individual one of them! An entity subordinating even kings and principalities of all kinds from which life, liberty, and the right to pursue ones own individual happiness flows – not to be hampered! Socialism stand in direct contradiction to those very rights granted by said superior entity over the objection of man’s own government(s)!

Far and away to many superciliously impede, even seek to deny, the inalienable sovereignty of the individual(s) granted solely by a superior to any form of man established government(s)!

HOWEVER: In no way does GOD’s word impede or deny the authority of humankind’s governments to both punish and/or execute in the performance of their duties as HIS servants. At this point it’s fully expected there be a certain amount of consternation even objection – but that is as it is decreed by Judeo-Christian Scripture(s). For a person to be a Christian, or Jew for that matter, is to be an alien resident in this land thereby to abide by the laws of this land in so much as they don’t interdict with those of The Kingdom of GOD – their primary citizenship just as it was with the Apostle Paul, being a holder of duel citizenship without contradiction(s)? More specifically, the Lord’s Prayer is found in Matthew 6:9-13 and Luke 11:2-4 wherein one is admonished to pray for that (GOD’s) kingdom to come here on Earth as it is in heaven – does it not?

PS1. As I recall it’s approximately 80% of the men in America’s prison are the product of fatherless homes – who then has had the deciding amount of influence on their lives? Give you a hint, it wasn’t their fathers was it?

PS2. Please do correct any errors you may discern - thanks in advance?

Posted by: TheUntoldPast
“The COMPELLING Execution Of Eddie Leonski - America's WW2 Serial Killer In Australia”

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
in·al·ien·a·ble
/inˈālēənəb(ə)l/
adjective

1. unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor:

"freedom of religion, the most inalienable of all human rights"

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries