2305131300Sa EVIL CONTRIVED! {a rant}

How can overt sexual differences between male and female human beings be social construction in any way? Can that, in and of itself, be anything other than EVIL CONTRIVANCE?

NOTE: Before we get past this opportunity, all these deplorable excuses for human beings that are guilty of feminism’s design first and foremost need to be required to at least detail their personal female oppression. Things such as the affluence they’ve suffered as just how many servants they’ve been forced to endured along with the ‘emotional labor’ they’ve been forced to endure by a husband agreeing to live with them in the same abode? And yes, you’d be right if you discerned there’s a point to the question. Just question any feminist’s personal life and the opulent privilege provided them by their husbands immediately shines through – even a single layer of settled dust is hard to find. The female privilege is so stark, in its contrast to what these creatures of destruction have actually lived, it’ll make you sick to your stomach.

Just look at Margaret Sanger whose husband, when she was able to even keep one, maintained two separate abodes. And Betty Friedan lived by herself with only her servants to keep her company. The male bondage to maintain these worthless troublemaker is unbelievable. Show me a feminist and I’ll show you a spoiled privileged woman. Even the minority, so called marginalized, feminists can’t comprehend that everything is relative – even privilege is relative. The one chain that’s bound all men to such perversion is legal commitment of one kind or other – such as marriage certificates being just one.

PS1. FEMINISM IS CONTRIVED EVIL – that’s a bottom line that can be taken to the bank true.

PS2. Sorry, if erratic, I got carried away by my pure disgust of feminism. I hope you can make something out of this chaotic rant of mine? But there is just no excuse for willingly ascribing to such an abominable hoax as feminism is. Even the conscience of Nazi Guards at Auschwitz is cleaner than those of any feminist leader.

Posted by: Studio B ~ 7 months ago ~ 6.3K views ~ 5.01K subscribers
“The Monstrous Lies of Simone De Beauvoir - The Fiamengo File 2.0”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance? Especially since, admittedly my fault, my word processor’s spell checking capability is out of control changing words without warning. And to think that AI is supposed to overwhelm us – what a mess that’ll be.

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Socialist/Feminist (whether he’s capable of realizing it or not?
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an existentialist (individualist) philosophy of life.
#ONLY PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE – STICKS & STONES DON’T, NOT EVEN GUNS KILL PEOPLE

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

o·vert

ADJECTIVE
overt (adjective)

done or shown openly; plainly or readily apparent, not secret or hidden:

"an overt act of aggression" · "in untreated cases, overt psychosis may occur"

SIMILAR: undisguised, unconcealed, plain, clear, apparent, conspicuous, unmistakable, obvious, noticeable, observable, visible, manifest, patent, open, public, above board, blatant, glaring, shameless, brazen, plain to see, plainly seen.

OPPOSITE: covert, hidden.

ORIGIN:
Middle English: from Old French, past participle of ovrir ‘to open’, from Latin aperire.

Data from Oxford Languages