Question

copied from another forum
A report from the other side of the narrative :

CV19 HOAX UPDATE:

Here's your update on what's happening in Sweden through 4-18. Deaths peaked on April 7 at 102. No lockdown ever went into effect in Sweden. All bars, restaurants, movie theaters, and schools remained open. Crisis over.

The IHME model everyone is using, still projects 5,890 deaths in Sweden. One week ago, the IHME was projecting 18,322 deaths in Sweden. The IHME model has been consistently wrong at every point.

Sweden most likely won't reach 2,000 deaths—which would project out to 66,000 deaths in America—or about the same as the seasonal flu. Sweden accomplished this with no mandatory social distancing, other than limiting public gatherings to 50 or less. Sweden saw quickly that CV19 is practically harmless to school children and their parents.

Sweden encouraged social distancing for the elderly and those with serious health issues, because CV19 literally kills more people who are over age 90 than under age 60. Sweden decided that the only way to defeat this virus was by building "herd immunity,” which happens when about 60% of the population gets the virus. Even 30% of the population contracting the virus slows it down a lot. This is how humans deal with all viruses; we build herd immunity to them. Flu vaccines are developed every year, but they are less than 50% effective.

One week ago, the news media was breathlessly typing articles explaining that Sweden was about to disappear into a sea of Coronavirus. The media is no longer covering Sweden; their story destroys the narrative that is being used to justify martial law in America—economic lockdown to deal with a virus that is little more than the common cold for healthy people.

Sweden is the only advanced country smart enough not to shut down its economy for this.

—Ben Hart

—from Demetri Antonis

#vaccination #population #children #parents #schools #humans #media #Flu

KeVince 8

Answer 1

Our media is approaching criminally negligent.

Answer 2

Apparently a reminder is necessary. 99% of fatalities from COVID-19 are those with pre-existing conditions, like cancer, cardiovascular disease, smokers, high blood pressure - all regardless of age. Only 1% of fatalities are of those with no identified pre-existing conditions (which also means they may have had a condition not identified)

The oft-repeated statement "We shouldn't re-open the economy until we are sure the danger is passed," is ridiculous. What danger? This is not much different than the flu, which also knocks down those with pre-existing conditions. Medical professionals expect those with these conditions to be taken out at any time by these things, despite their best efforts.

So should we be afraid of 1% of even 6% of the mortality rate? In reality that is about quarter of your risk of dying in your car. Are you afraid of that so much that you will stop driving, or demand that the government shut down the economy until it is safe enough to drive? No? So why are you not demanding the government lift these draconian lockdowns????

[informationisbeautiful.net]


Author	Author:
Type of abuse	I think this violates the community guidelines. Chat or rant, adult content, spam, insulting other members I think this is illegal. Harm to minors, violence or threats, harassment or privacy invasion, impersonation or misrepresentation, fraud or phishing, etc.
Additional Details If Needed

Chat room is open

Post a comment Author doesn't reply Reply Author doesn't reply Add Photo

Be part of the movement!

2 comments

Recent Visitors 17

Photos 11,806 More

Members 9,404Top

Moderators

Related GroupsMore