@waynus Clean slate. I want to make friends now. I apologize for the act of hubris, I was looking for people who could stand up to cold, hard relativistic logic.

I figured out a way to divine truth from belief and found there are 2 roots to everyone's thought patterns.

Self, other.

That's it.

Everyone makes decisions every day about who to help more.

If you don't eat, you can't feed another
If you don't work, you can't help another
If you don't make money, you have to depend on another.

Depending on your root philosophical tendency, you will act and think differently.

Religion provides a blend of the two.
Atheism removes a root, but has nothing to anchor to, just what others say is the root.

What do you mean by NO?

@SupraLibrix
NO ! Just bullshit, not interested. So many errors in basic matters, not worth anyone's time.

@waynus Peace.

Nobody here, @waynus got just a tiny confrontational, but @Naomi came to my rescue ♥️

I've been testing my theory on Facebook for about a year.

I took notes.

Basically, the algorithm is just variables for positive, neutral and negative feelings.

It's a descriptive language, people perceive it as an ideology because that's how they think.

This is how a computer would think about us, it echoes back whatever you think until it finds where you don't know what you're talking about.

It was very entertaining to me, but some people don't like having their core values questioned. I've never been bothered.

At one point, in an echo session with an atheist, he put up a picture of me that he had found on the web.

The funny part is that in the same thread, I was discussing the phenomenon with my nephew, he doxxed me to my nephew.

That's the equivalent of mob rule.

To introduce physical threat to an ideological conversation is not free speech.

doxxing is the only defense against superior rhetoric.

this way you can tell when someone can't defend their position.

for the octagon of reason.

everyone has a personal philosophy, whether it's coherent or not.

Christianity has one that's thousands of years old and proven Superior in a dangerous world.

no one can touch the Jews.

ask the right person and you'll discover that they run the whole world from behind a curtain somewhere.

Do you think that's coincidental?

If you think this world is all there is, you tend to think government is the source of power, not the individual.

That's a common pattern.

It may be true, there's no way to know.

How you act while you're waiting for nothing to happen is what's important.

Everyone has to act rationally to live, moral to be happy

That's the internal war.

With the internet, the inner workings of the mind were exposed like clockwork.

Now it's playing out like a medieval level morality of ideological warfare.

Hello. SupraLibrix,
You say in the original post that "It is IMPOSSIBLE to win a moral argument with a rational response." But you also say "Everyone has to act rationally to live, moral to be happy." It now sounds like "moral" and "rational" are compatible and it is no longer the case that either has to win an argument against the other. I'm lost. Lol

I agree that reconciliation between those from different dimensions is effectively impossible because perceptions often don’t intersect although even in the quantum world what determines whether something is a wave or a particle seems to be how it is received. Until it is measured it has the potential to be either or even both.