20.10.17.2326Sa A GOLDEN NUGGET IN THE PAN? Saramarylop3z, I wish to start by acknowledging your kind response to my earlier post concerning “WHAT IS OBJECTIFICATION OF MEN?” Your response was quite commendable – unusually noble if I might say. Truth be known I’d forgotten that I’d posted “WHAT IS OBJECTIFICATION OF MEN?” because only about half of what I write I actually post.

Bear with me a little longer if you don’t mind as something of import may have occurred. You see, it is my habit to sleep with sound playing away other than music. Either the sound of rain or someone arguing their position on sme topic of interest – just not music. As it happened I was sleeping & listening to Randal Carlson, a gentle giant of a man from Atlanta I believe; BUT thinking in my sleep about “WHAT IS OBJECTIFICATION OF MEN?” and the philosophy of Ayn Rand she called OBJECTIVISM. Contrary to feminist female supremacists multitasking isn’t a gendered thing as they relish. At any rate, while he (Randall Carlson) blathered on or rather continued on with his discourse as blathered would be disrespectful of such a gentleman, half asleep I began attempting to see objectification through the eyes of a female. I don’t think there is a word for such remote introspection as I was trying to do while at the same time half asleep & listening to Mr. Carlson. Or was it Graham Handcock? It really doesn’t matter – they’re both interesting. Hopefully your still able to understand my rambling.

But to the golden nugget: While this was going through my mind I was trying to see LOVE through the eyes of Ayn Rand’s objectivist philosophy. And it occurred to me that she wasn’t seeing love the same as a man because she wasn’t a man. And that is why views on the subject were so foreign to me. (I didn’t mention that she made her views on love quite clear in interview.) Like a big neon sign shinning through thick fog, it dawned on me that the reason none of these views meshed was that they are male & female views. Or like the glint of a golden nugget being unnoticed & left in the pan. THEY’RE NOT THE SAME.

Mind you that Ayn Rand was & is considered by many to have been “A GOD AMONG MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way). A truly rarefied element in deed. You see MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) don’t hate women; they hate what feminism has made of them. At any rate I’d wondered why she’d named her philosophy OBJECTIVISM? Men & Women will never understand the others form of love until they recognize they don’t love the same for the same reasons. It’s just one more difference between men & women that’s being deliberately overlooked by feminism. Wishing you the best, I shall stop for now as I believe I could write a booklet on what I’ve left unsaid here. Thank you for your comment & in advance for you patience with this shortfall of a post.

PS. REMEMBER, SHE’S SEEING THROUGH A WOMAN’S EYES & NOT A MAN’S.

1914 wizard OUT

Posted by: LibertyPen Dec 13, 2013
“Ayn Rand - Love and Values”