The accepted policy of marxist progressives, blm - critical theory/CRT and an+ifa are all in sync Herbert Marcuse. Marcuse brought his marxist beliefs with him when as a communist he escaped nazi Germany. He infected our youth through his time in academia. The Weather Underground violence was just the beginning of the revolution to bring about the total transformation of America. Obama was a marxist just like Marcuse.

blm/CRT (critical theory) and an+ifa practice his philosophy of repressive intolerance which Marcuse frames as liberating tolerance that advocates violent activism against those that oppose their marxist ideals and goals.

Marcuse says -

Marcuse argued that, because of the radical repressiveness of Western society, a tolerance for all viewpoints actually contributed to social oppression. A pervasive network of assumptions and biases implicitly privileges the viewpoint of the powerful, so that seemingly “equal” presentations of opposite opinions actually end up benefiting the viewpoint of the powerful. He offered the example of a magazine running a piece criticizing the FBI along with one praising the FBI. Fair and balanced? Not so fast, Marcuse said: “the chances are that the positive [story] wins because the image of [the FBI] is deeply engraved in the mind of the people.” Because of social programming, the inhabitants of a given society automatically favor certain values. The ideological playing field’s lack of levelness means that seemingly equal presentations of ideas are not really equal.

[His “remedy”] includes the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc. Moreover, the restoration of freedom of thought may necessitate new and rigid restrictions on teachings and practices in the educational institutions (political correctness and censorship) which, by their very methods and concepts, serve to enclose the mind within the established universe of discourse and behavior — thereby precluding a priori a rational evaluation of the alternatives. And to the degree to which freedom of thought involves the struggle against inhumanity, restoration of such freedom would also imply intolerance toward scientific research in the interest of deadly “deterrents,” of abnormal human endurance under inhuman conditions, etc.