21.10.27.0100W FEMALE ACCOUNTABILITY IS NOT BEING HELD AS A MEN’S RIGHTS ISSUE!

DISCLAIMER or PRE-CLAIMER or just CLAIMER: I really don’t care how my personal views appear to you or anyone else – don’t them, well you know where you can go to file your objection(s).

This lovely, very intelligent, young lady LAUDABLY is an MRA (Men’s Rights Activist) which all to her credit as a genuine human being – apparently one of the few walking the earth at present. Also to her credit is her association with “THE HONEY-BADGERS” group from Canada,.

NOW THE BITTER FRUIT: It should be apparent to everyone that feminism holds sway over the human narrative presently- at least in the western world? Women will deny being feminist to everyone including t6heir poor husbands & boyfriends turn right around as vote as a block with feminist causes of their sister-hood no matter how repugnant those issues may be.

During history social ostracism was used to hold women in compliance with at least appearing to conform to the current norms of decent female behavior – what ever that is or was?. No such social mechanism exist today. Now whether social ostracism was right or wrong really isn’t the issue of concern to me. Men’s rights were obfuscated and denied then just as they are now. There’s been no progress for the rights of men made while feminism has loosed woman-kind to do willy-nilly just as she pleases to the detriment of men.

Professor Paglia’s book title “Free Women Free Men” has such a deceptive title – don’t you think? Men haven’t been freed in the least.

SUGGESTION: Though I’m sure the idea will meet with strong opposition from feminists, I’d suggest the government keep an ongoing data base listing all abortions when and by whom for future issuance of marriage certificates by the applicable state(s). Or doesn’t a man even deserve to know that his proposed wife would have no qualms about murdering hid child? Already a man is being denied DNA corroboration of his fatherhood. He’s even denied notice and/or observation of the child supposedly his being born. In addition, though it’d be argued, he (the father) isn’t even part of the family unit any longer. In short, men have no rights with regard to family or reproduction, Men only have obligations to support – that’s it!

In no way am I advocating marriage for men – let that be very clear. Because there’s absolutely nothing a man can possibly gain by marriage – other than his wallet which will remain part of the family unit with him.

PS. Just the other day, I was watching a relationship coach by the name of Kevin Samuels on Youtube. He coaches these young women who call in wanting to know how to trap what they euphemistically call a Quality Man. What they mean by a Quality Man is summed up by 666. They want him to be 6 feet tall, have 6 pack abs, earn a 6 figure income – in short, they’re gold digging whores looking for gullible prince charming s to feast upon. At any rate, one phoned in telling him that as she was getting older and wanted a Quality Man to married and divorced. Yes, that’s right, she said marry and divorce in the same sentence. I’ll leave you to figure out what kind of man would want her – I’m sure I don’t know? Check him out, even though he’s a relationship coach you might get some tips on how to avoid these whores?

Gentlemen, consider MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) individualist philosophy of life for yourself. But regardless your decision do not say “I Do” to anyone or anything thereby not making your legal position worse than it already is by being born male.

1 Corinthians 7:27 Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife. 28 But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned;

MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way)

#LetsGoBrandon (Always happy to cheer on a nice young man – right?)

Posted by: The Prim Reaper ~ Sep 29, 2021
“The Abortion of Civil Discourse”