2202050100Sa IT’S ALL ABOUT CONTROL TO THE EXCLUSION OF LIBERTY?

I for one, don’t understand why the United States Declaration of Independence isn’t recognized as even more important that The United States Constitution? We hear constantly about The Constitution when it or nothing else means anything without The Declaration of Independence?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Excerpt from The Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ………..”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No, I’m not insinuating that The United States Constitution is transient without force as Joe Biden did state. What I am saying is that out of all history the United States Declaration of Independence affirms that the “..unalienable Rights….” of mankind are from GOD and not from some tin-pot human tyrants such as kings and/or president!

After the Declaration of Independence was approved by Congress, it was ordered to be engrossed on parchment and signed by the delegates. The engrosser was most likely Timothy Matlack, one of Secretary Charles Thomson's assistants. Matlack completed the parchment by August 2nd (with only two corrected errors), and the delegates commenced with signing. Many signatures were added on August 2nd, and the rest were added in the coming months as delegates returned to or arrived in Philadelphia (Thomas McKean's was the last signature added, sometime between 1777 and 1781). The parchment was entrusted to Thomson, was rolled up with other documents, and traveled with the Continental Congress as they moved locations over the course of the Revolutionary War. It was then entrusted to the office of the Secretary of State; the first, ironically, being Thomas Jefferson. In the 20th century, custody transferred to the Library of Congress, and then to the National Archives. Today, you can see the now-faded parchment at the National Archives, along with the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

It amazes me how many people are out there willing help you understand what Jesus meant – always their views of course, when it’s written there in front of you for you to understand? Can any of these intellectually high status (pharisees) mitigate or carry your judgment for you?

I GUESS THIS IS A MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST?

Below are applicable government definitions from ‘A’ to ‘D.’ Which one described represents human liberty – your liberty? I don’t know how much more clear Jesus could’ve made the distinction that exists between that which is Caesar's (Joe Biden et al) and that which is GOD’s?

Posted by: Timcast IRL ~ Streamed live 5 hours ago
“Timcast IRL - GoFundMe SEIZES Freedom Convoy Funding, 71 Joe Rogan Episodes DELETED w/Enrique Tarrio”

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matthew 22:19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. 20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? 21 They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s. (kjv)

Mark 12:16 And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar’s. 17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s. And they marvelled at him. (kjv)

Luke 20:24 Shew me a penny. Whose image and superscription hath it? They answered and said, Caesar’s. 25 And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar’s, and unto God the things which be God’s. 26 And they could not take hold of his words before the people: and they marvelled at his answer, and held their peace. (kjv)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
lib·er·ty
/ˈlibərdē/
noun

1. the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views:

"compulsory retirement would interfere with individual liberty"

Similar: independence, freedom, autonomy, sovereignty

Opposite: dependence, subjugation

2. the power or scope to act as one pleases:

"individuals should enjoy the liberty to pursue their own interests and preferences"

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
{A}

cap·i·tal·ism
/ˈkapədlˌizəm/
noun

1. an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are
   controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state:

"an era of free-market capitalism"

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
{B}

fas·cism
/ˈfaSHˌiz(ə)m/
noun

1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social
   organization.

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
{C}

so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌliz(ə)m/
noun

1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the
   means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the
   community as a whole:

"we want a real democratic and pluralist left party—one which unites all those who
believe in socialism"

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
{D}

com·mu·nism
/ˈkämyəˌniz(ə)m/
noun

1. a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a
   society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid
   according to their abilities and needs.