2301031400Tu THE AMERICAN GESTAPO(S):

Now I’m sure that criticism will ensue as a result of this criticism in turn, but there’s no other explanation for policing misconduct in this United States of America other than a deplorable, them versus us, comradery (camaraderie) amongst, tax funded gangs of thugs. I’m not saying that all policing is corrupted, just that far too much of it has been corrupted to maintain legitimacy in a free states.

Power must be the most intoxicating of elixirs (concoctions) ever formulated by humanity? My supposition being, in the matter of policing, that nothing was amiss as long as such positions of authority considered themselves Peace Officers, but once they imbibed the poison of power they began terming themselves as Law Enforcement Officers -- corrupted absolutely?

Surely civilization has progressed past the days of hiring criminals to deter other criminals – that is what we’ve historically done after all. Only humans could’ve refined to a fine art form the acts of (war) killing other human beings – no other living souls (breathers) have done that, have they. Yes, yes I know, much to the dismay of science a select few other primates have progressed to the points of holding territories by force and, even what might loosely be termed as, war amongst themselves.

Some time ago, it was both appropriate and correctly pointed out to me that it was never GOD’s intention there ever be a ruler(s) from among humankind to rule over their fellow humans. But HE did concede to the wishes of the people giving them what they wanted. Since then man has ruled man to humankind’s own detriment be it as GOD’s servants on Earth.

Why there is such an unquenchable thrust for power within humans is a very important and therefore significant question? You see this thirst play itself out in all aspects of human existence. For example, feminists cry ‘toxic masculinity’ when they can’t garner absolute power over men. But individual sovereignty over ones self is and of itself isn’t toxic in the least. However feminism seeking such power over that man is indeed toxic. To which feminists retort that it’s ‘toxic’ this masculinity that refuses to bend the knee as it were. Masculinity,in and of itself, can’t possibly be ‘toxic’ regardless of what the APA has to say about it. However the masculine individual may, I said may, apply his masculine attributes to toxic purposes in which case Collective Socialists such as the APA conclude that all masculinity must be toxic – collectively toxic.

The real question should be: Why isn’t it enough for the individual to be sovereign over their own personage – answering only for their own personal actions and no others?

MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) is an individualist philosophy of life advocating individual sovereignty of ones self alone. MGTOW admonishes against marriage, or any other commitment, that can make the individual responsible for anyone other than themselves. Is there not something DEEPLY wrong with anyone wishing to control others – is there not?

MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) owe nothing to anyone other than an accounting for their own personal actions before the judgment seat of their CREATOR. Can you account for yourself?

PS1. These attorneys have twisted and calloused their inner sense of justice so mush they don’t recognize the difference between a ‘lie’ and a falsehood or untruth etc. A lie is EXCLUSIVELY an untruth perpetrated for the purpose of causing harm to another. The oath administered upon giving testimony is explicitly worded in such a way as to circumvent this very distinction. But this is no small subject as I could go on and on citing the proofs of what a lie is and is not.

PS2. The next thing of interest is the unwillingness of these attorneys to accept the simple fact that if a tree is poisonous so to are all its fruit so considered to be. That’s why I’m against such things as “no knock warrants, along with all forms of official immunity – a crime is a crime. Once these officers broke in unannounced this man had every right imaginal to be armed on the ready to defend himself.

PS3. It’s a very slippery slope when authoritarians of any variety convince themselves that their actions are just and honorable because the ends they purport to seek are holy and pure. Adolf Hitler did, didn’t he?

The Myrtle Beach Sun News ~ 3 years ago ~ 73K views
“Julian Betton case: Judges hear cop’s excessive force appeal”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminist.
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

gestapo
noun

plural gestapos

: a secret-police organization employing underhanded and terrorist methods against persons suspected of disloyalty

[merriam-webster.com]