It is the first thing that racists notice.

It’s because to use guns in defense of life is bad for Communism but to use guns to hurt children supports the communism. Also the boy who only shot to stop people threatening his life with force is white and the boy who shot to cause children undo pain and death is Mexican, and democrats say this is the United States of Mexico.

Actually the issue is gun laws and how every time there is a shooting the only thing that can be done is virtue signaling "thoughts and prayers" and any attempt to do anything else is seen as partisan politics and "too soon" and "dangerous Communism" and "trying to grab guns and rip up the 2nd Amendment".

Instead people will blame rap music or video games or even doors, and never think why the USA has all of these shootings whereas other countries with guns and rap and video games don't.

Instead people will say it has nothing to do with gun culture but it is rather mental health, while at the same time cutting the budget for mental health services.

Instead people will say they need more guns - have an ARO in the school... despite several cases where there was one who did nothing. Have a good guy with a gun? Well in Uvalde the police stood around and did nothing while children were being executed, and even stopped anyone from trying to help.

The issue is that the Uvalde shooter had a history of violent behavior and stalking, and claimed he "threw dead cats at houses". Yet a day after his 18th birthday he was able to buy an assault rifle and hundreds of rounds of ammo, completely legal, with no objection. The shooter in Buffalo bought his guns legally. Maybe we should do something to address this, rather than nothing?

Rittenhouse was a different case. First he illegally purchased his gun through a straw purchase, and the man who did this for him was charged for this crime.

Neither should have had a gun, but the Uvalde shooter had his legally - Rittenhouse didn't. They are two different issues, and we should be able to address both.

Also, never forget, in the Rittenhouse case, the court acknowledged that they would have come to the same conclusion - justified self defense - if it was the other way around and one of the victims had killed Rittenhouse instead.