No one got any answers right.

First paragraph:
“Social media networks are scrambling to get rid of a viral conspiracy video spreading false claims about the coronavirus, according to a report.”

(It’s not news that the claims are false, it’s an agenda driven opinion. What report? Why should it be believed?)

Paragraph three:

“The clip, apparently an excerpt of a larger documentary to be released this summer, makes a number of bogus, unproven or misleading claims, like that the coronavirus pandemic was created to make profits off vaccines.”

(What is the argument against each? What are the arguments advanced in support? What are the credentials of those making the claims? Classic Alinsky tactics—never argue the issues, smear the opponent.)

Paragraph Four:

“ And in defiance of the advice of medical experts, it suggests that masks can make people sicker and that sheltering in place harms the immune system.”

(Classic assumption closed trick—assume your position has already been proven; dismiss opposing viewpoints without making either your own points, or specifying the opposing points being so casually dismissed.)

Paragraph seven:

“Suggesting that wearing a mask can make you sick could lead to imminent harm, so we’re removing the video,” a Facebook spokeswoman said..”

(Elevates a social media spokeswoman to the ranks of experts. What is her expertise on this topic. More to the point what is the expertise of the person making the dismissed claim?)

Paragraph nine:

“ The company said the video, one of three on the site, was scrapped for making claims about a cure for the virus not backed by health organizations.”

(What cure? What health organizations? They take pains not to identify either. One must assume they refer to the WHO, a demonstrably corrupt appendage of the Chinese Communist Party. If it was a different organization, it would have been identified, if for no other reason than to avoid it being mistaken for the thoroughly discredited WHO. Likewise, the cure can only be the use of Hydroxychlorquine used with zinc and azithromycin, a protocol that has been studiously ignored, ridiculed and debunked by those resisting any possibility that this isn’t a threat to Nanking, despite overwhelming success in treating the disease and being advocated by reputable doctors, hospitals and medical centers worldwide.)

In short, conjecture, opinion, vilification and smears, all agenda driven. No facts in sight. This is news?

For the record, the clip in question features Judy Mitkovit who first isolated the HIV virus, had her work appropriated (stolen) by the team of Robert Gallo and Anthony Fauci, and whose PhD dissertation is responsible for the protocol that turned HIV from a guaranteed death sentence to a treatable condition. Her first patient? Magic Johnson (in case you ever wondered why he’s still alive.)

SOS....Different day. The left always uses the fallicy argument "Appeal to Authority".... ie. Scientists say.... experts say....blah blah blah

They tend to obfuscate facts, for example, the prediction of deaths from COVID-19 in the millions, then hundreds of thousands, then.... who knows? Their memories are always short when the "Authority" turns out to be full of shit. Interesting that Cuomo found out that a majority of cases came from people who "sheltered in place", and more interesting that he was stupid enough to admit he and the "experts" were wrong.

Sorry, as for your contest... it only takes one to go, "Yeah, but what about?"

"according to a report" is not as strong as "a movie with names, dates, places and times" as "proof". I can check the movie's claims, I can't check the articles claims.