Biden warns in primetime speech, ‘Democracy is under assault’,

Sep 2, 2022 Joe Biden has delivered a rare primetime address to the nation, warning of threats to American democracy.

— US President Joe Biden during a speech on State of Democracy in Philadelphia:

— "Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundation of our Republic..."

Townhall.com (@townhallcom) (https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1565492533014282240)

[t.me]

— US President Joe Biden during a speech on State of Democracy in Philadelphia:
— "MAGA Republicans... Embrace anger. They thrive on chaos. They live not in the light of truth but in the shadow of lies."

Townhall.com (@townhallcom) (https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1565493535717179394)

[t.me]

TUCKER CARLSON: Joe Biden’s message tonight is that 75,000,000 Americans are Nazis. Tonight’s address in Philadelphia is not being categorized as a campaign event, this is a White House event, in other words, what Joe Biden is saying right now is the official position of the entire Executive Branch, including the DOJ, the various intel agencies and the US Military

[t.me]

TUCKER CARLSON: For hundreds of years the US has had a political system compromised of two competing parties, if you were to declare one of those parties criminal and illegitimate, what would you be left with? You’d be left with a one party state. And that is what Joe Biden is calling for tonight

[t.me]

Joe Biden On Twitter, pictures bellow.

...............................

In 2007, F. Fürstenberg wrote in the New York Times ["Bush’s Dangerous Liaisons"], in connection with the French Revolution – upon the etymology of the word "terrorist"as well:

The word was an invention of the French Revolution, and it referred not to those who hate freedom, nor to non-state actors, nor, of course, to Islamofascism. "A ‘terroriste’ was, in its original meaning, a Jacobin leader who ruled France during La Terreur (Reign of Terror)."

(Reign of Terror) -refers to a period during the French Revolution after the First French Republic was established in which multiple massacres and public executions occurred in response to revolutionary fervor, anti-clerical sentiment, and frivolous accusations of treason by Maximilien Robespierre and his Committee of Public Safety.

While some historians believe the "reign of terror" began in 1793, with the starting date being either 5 September, June, or March (birth of the Revolutionary Tribunal), and others believe it began in September 1792 (September Massacres), or even July 1789 (when the first killing occurred), there is agreement that it ended with the fall of Maximilien Robespierre in July 1794, as this led to the Thermidorian Reaction.

Between June 1793 and the end of 1794, there were 16,594 official death sentences in France, of which 2,639 were in Paris.

In his book, Inside Terrorism, Bruce Hoffman offered an explanation of why the term "terrorism" becomes distorted:

On one point, at least, everyone agrees: terrorism is a pejorative term. It is a word with intrinsically negative connotations that is generally applied to one’s enemies and opponents, or to those with whom one disagrees and would otherwise prefer to ignore. "What is called terrorism," Brian Jenkins has written, "thus seems to depend on one’s point of view." The term implies a moral judgment; and if one party is successful in affixing the label "terrorist" to its opponent, it has indirectly persuaded others to adopt its moral viewpoint.Hence, the decision to call someone or label some organization a terrorist becomes almost unavoidably subjective, depending largely on whether one sympathizes with or opposes the person/group/cause concerned. If one identifies with the victim of the violence, for example, then the act is terrorism. If, however, one identifies with the perpetrator, the violent act is regarded in a more sympathetic, if not positive (or, at the worst, an ambivalent) light; it is not terrorism. "

During World War II, the Malayan People’s Anti-Japanese Army was allied with the British, but during the Malayan Emergency, members of its successor (the Malayan Race’s Liberation Army) were branded ‘terrorists’ by the British.

More recently, Ronald Reagan and others in the American administration frequently called the mujahedin ‘freedom fighters’ during the Soviet–Afghan War, yet twenty years later, when a new generation of Afghan men were fighting against what they perceived to be a regime installed by foreign powers, their attacks were labeled ‘terrorism’ by George W. Bush.

Groups accused of terrorism understandably prefer terms reflecting legitimate military or ideological action. Professor Martin Rudner, director of the Canadian Centre of Intelligence and Security Studies at Carleton University in Ottawa, defines ‘terrorist acts’ as unlawful attacks with political or other ideological goals, and says:

There is the famous statement: ‘One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.’ But that is grossly misleading. It assesses the validity of the cause when terrorism is an act. One can have a perfectly beautiful cause, and yet if one commits terrorist acts, it is terrorism regardless.

Some groups, when involved in a ‘liberation’ struggle, have been called ‘terrorists’ by the Western governments or media. Later, these same people, as leaders of the liberated nations, are called ‘statesmen’ by similar organizations. Two examples of this phenomenon are the Nobel Peace Prize laureates, Menachem Begin and Nelson Mandela. Sarah Palin and Joe Biden have called WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange a ‘terrorist.’

Media outlets who wish to convey impartiality may limit their usage of ‘terrorists’ and ‘terrorism’ because they are loosely defined, potentially controversial in nature, and subjective terms.

Have you been paying attention to the rhetoric of the American government and their actions and results?

The ‘war on poverty’ is the unofficial name for legislation first introduced by United States President Lyndon B. Johnson during his state of the Union address on January 8, 1964. This legislation was proposed by Johnson in response to a national poverty rate of around 19 percent.

The result is more poverty than ever and the Great Society only expanded the welfare state, government dependence, and did the opposite of what it said.

The ‘war on drugs’ is a global campaign, led by the U.S. federal government, of drug prohibition, military aid, and military intervention, with the aim of reducing the illegal drug trade in the United States. The initiative includes a set of drug policies that are intended to discourage the production, distribution, and consumption of psychoactive drugs that the participating governments and the UN have made illegal.

The result is more drug trafficking, more addicts, more violence , more cartel control, more overdoses, etc. Predictable

The ‘War on Terror’, also known as the Global War on Terrorism, is an international military campaign launched by the United States government after the September 11 attacks.

Do I really need to go into the disastrous results of this one? From the Patriot Act and many other draconian laws to the fiasco in Afghanistan, 2+ trillion dollars spent, armed Taliban, global humiliation, leaving people behind, etc.

Biden’s ‘War on COVID’ Becomes a War on the Unvaccinated. The new ‘terrorists’

‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated’-Joe Biden

Academic Agent: "You are the virus."

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." ― "War on Terror" speech by George W. Bush, 2004 Video