How do you avoid copy right infringement on images. A magazine implies lots of engaging visual content but what we usually see here are images and videos someone else created.

All great ideas, especially the magazine and post of the day!

I know 1 thing from reading this site for sure. You better limit length as some will try to write books. It should be the length of standard editorials whatever that is?

Good! Can't wait to see how it goes. Maybe I'll be able to contribute...or not...LOL

I LOVE IT! This is the way to get Facebook followers away from Facebook, as this is how they started, people love pictures, reading the writing comes second. GOOD FOR YOU, KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK. I wish you well.

I would like to see a weekly feature made of member nominated, best of week posts, comments, or total strings of oconversations .

This is a good idea and a good thing. The main problem with many people today is that they do not read. This fits right into the gapping suck hole of leftism that looks for suckers that can be manipulated. Memes and assorted junk, pop culture and music are the newspaper "funnys" of times past. Many read only the funny papers in the back of the paper, not the journalistic content at all or little.
Anything that can get the new "on purpose" digital dumb downers and liberal teachers new forced ignorance in the schools -to read- is to be perused at all costs.
The left wants them dumb. When people do not read, they are left open to music and entertainment that are perfect tools for conditioning and brainwashing propaganda of the left.
Believe it or not, some people only listen to cheap pop music and watch leftist controlled sit-com type entertainment. And some still wonder why we are where we are at.

Love the magazine and the pinned post of the day!

I think it would be great to have member-generated content clearly marked. I haven't generated any myself and don't know if I will, but there are some members who do post fantastic original content (I found this site thanks to one of them) and it would be great to see that content highlighted. And if it's just a tick box, then why not?

I don't like any kind of censorship or anything that makes it harder for content creators and consumers to connect. That's why I love this site! I can see where the suggestion of labeling groups as "extra controversial" is coming from, but I have concerns about how it might be implemented and whether it may become a slippery slope. I would love to see what other members have to say about it.

I've really enjoyed the posts as well as discussions. I can't believe that I'm not suprised Google banned the android app. I wonder if anyone making those decisions has even visited. I didn't know what to expect when I searched out this site. All I knew was that I wanted to talk and learn more about what's going on in the world and MSM and social media was extremely one sided about everything. I'm not disappointed

Controversial groups? Yup. They exist. I can understand the concern to a degree, like how far is too far etc. But, like you said, if topics can be civil and debated then I see no reason why not. The ones that I feel like I might contribute to, I do so. The ones that I don't have any interest in, I don't interact with. It's really that simple. I think, for the most part, I can tell either by the group description or posts though.

I really enjoy the post of the day and wouldn't mind seeing more. I also look forward to seeing the magazine.

Edit: I agree with @LargoEmbargo

Marking some groups as "extra controversial" is a bad idea. That is similar to what YouTube did by putting some videos in "limited state" to give the impression that their content was somehow extreme or dangerous. This is a free speech site, so don't reinforce mainstream taboos; let people judge for themselves what is too controversial for them to read.