Time 38:00 or so…

Bannon: “Do you have enough probable cause...”

May I remind people that the question being asked works differently under Roman Law (Admiralty/Equity/Chancellery/Exchequer/Summary JustUS) compared to common law.

Until recently there was clear distinction between a Court of Law and a Court NOT-OF-LAW, such as an Admiralty Court. In a common law court, which is a Court of law, the duty of determining justification (probable cause) is not a Special Privilege, nor is it a prerogative, it is not a lawful power exclusive to an “elite,” and it is not a jurisdiction exclusive to an “elite,” or licensed, or anointed, or Knighted member allowed to join the CLUB. If that is the base behind the quoted question, then that base is not Law, it is not eluding to due process of law, it has no relevance to the law of the land, it isn’t part of a justice system, and it belongs exclusively into the CLUB where special privileges are assumed by those who can get away with such a usurpation.

Where is my evidence?

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.”

A witness to a crime, such as this crime of treasonous fraud, at the highest levels of the CLUB, is empowered to adjudicate probable cause as a witness to the fraud as it happened.

The witness is duty bound to move to the next step, which is obviously a force of will employed by the witness to move to and find a member of a grand jury, or someone who can contact a member of a grand jury, and then the member of the grand jury is duty bound to determine probable cause based upon the evidence that is evidently probable cause according to the witness. Since this is not a witness witnessing someone failing to wear a mask, alone, surfing on the beach, and this is a witness that witnessed a treasonous crime that can easily be traced to the highest levels of the CLUB, then the self-evident fact authorizes the grand jury member to go to the next step, which is to form a grand jury on behalf of the witness, not on behalf of the accused, because the grand jury has no right, no duty, to try the case. The right, the duty, the onus of responsibility, to try the case, is clearly placed in the hands of an independent (not stacked, not lied to by a treasonous judge in the ClUB) trial jury in a Court of Law.

Where is my evidence?

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”

So all of you people whose knee jerks and you look at the above and you claim: you have no evidence, to those people, you my former friend, are a member of the CLUB, as either a master or a slave, and I hope that position you have earns you what all before you have earned by your choice to be a member of that CLUB.

Populist Press
[populist.press]

Why Every Legal Vote Matters
[everylegalvote.com]