[independent.co.uk]

“Ms Maxwell will be tried in the downtown Manhattan courtroom of US District Court Judge Alison J Nathan, beginning on 29 November, a date the judge warned lawyers was “firm”.”

More obvious US V THEM (divide and conquer) double standard contradictory treasonous fraud self-evident facts that matter.

Two Major Trials Back-to-Back (overlapping) Televised Live and creating yet more division and polarization along very specific race and party, or faction, lines, and dropped in the mix is an secreted (not televised) "trial" involving one of the treasonous frauds for obvious treasonous fraud leading right to the closed door of the leadership of treasonous fraud?

None of these trials are lawful according to documented law that is the documented law claimed to be the "leaderships" authority at law.

1. Delayed Proceedings are criminal acts, nonfeasance, misfeasance, malfeasance, and misprision of treason. That is basic law. Justice delayed (by criminals) is justice denied, as more, and more, and more innocent people are consumed in the meat grinder while justice is delayed by the treasonous criminals delaying due process of law.

2. One set of rules are used by RULERS to keep the slaves in line, and another set of rules are used by RULERS to keep their own fellow criminals in line.

A. Due Process of Law, the common law, the law of the land, as documented in Mathew 7:12, a declaration of independence, a bill of rights, and cases where private people independently prosecute suspected criminals where accuser and accused state their cases before independent people in trial juries in a Court of Law, not a Court of Admiralty or Equity, or other Summary Just-US Kangaroo Court.

B. Roman Civil Rules, RULERS assuming arbitrary power to enforce their version of "law" formed into Statutes, Ordinances, Licenses, Acts, Proclamations, and Edicts, that are ODERS TO BE OBEYED WITHOUT QUESTION, which means no "or else," don't even think about disobedience.

The list goes on and on, clearly showing the precise divorcing of law, as it is in fact, and crime as it is also demonstrated factually as criminals confess their guilt while they perpetrate the crimes that they decide to perpetrate in order for them to then be criminals in fact.

Either facts matter, or falsehood matters, and the grey area confesses which side someone is on.