In an amazing timing coincidence, Twitter [blog.twitter.com] and Facebook [washingtonpost.com] both announced new censorship rules on what they define as "hate speech". Twitter says they are simply expanding their definition to include race and give stereotypical inflammatory anti-BIPOC(non-white) examples such as "All [national origin] are cockroaches who live off welfare..." and "People who are [race] are leeches...". Twitter didn't include similar derogative statements made towards whites (see " What are black people superior at?"). In a similar move, Facebook is changing their "hate speech" algorithms to depriortize hateful comments against Whites, men, and Americans... perhaps signaling that these groups are fair game for "hate"?
It's sad, but for some reason we need to have something to fight against. So, why not make up something as we're not fighting another country? Now, white men are vilified.
Probably, it will lead to segregation. It is very divisive.
If you substitute some of the comments on here like MW with gay instead of women - you will get the real picture.
Posted by Admin Does teaching "white guilt" also cultivate a "white pride" backlash?
Posted by Admin Is it time to take a knee on the Superbowl?
Posted by Admin Why not equality right now?
Posted by Admin How's Biden doing?
Posted by Admin How many good friends do you have from other political tribes?
Posted by Admin What did Trump do, if anything, to incite violence?
Posted by Admin Is free speech dead?
Posted by Admin Is free speech dead?
Posted by Admin Is free speech dead?
Posted by Admin Under what time and circumstance is the use of violence warranted?
Posted by Admin Now what?
Posted by Admin What do you expect to be achieved by this week's pro-Trump DC rally?
Posted by Admin What did you learn in 2020?
Posted by Admin Should pedophiles be allowed to have "child" sex robots?
Posted by Admin Do you have a "line in the sand" regarding political or social change?
Posted by Admin Should big tech firms hire more Blacks and Hispanics?