Whenever leaders start talking about plans using vague language, it's likely that they either don't know what they're talking about or they're hiding something dangerous. The World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" plan is a good example. According to their website, "the Great Reset initiative has a set of dimensions to build a new social contract that honours the dignity of every human being." As governments world-wide are deficit spending at record rates (US 2020 federal budget deficit is at $3.1 trillion), it seems like the Covid Pandemic is providing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for a "great reset". But... what does it really mean?
It is all of these things and more, so much more. They (the global elite) have decided they should be in control of your life. They plan to make eating meat a "special occasion" or "treat". According to them, "you will own nothing" and be happy to "rent" everything. You will have "no privacy" but you won't mind. They plan to make sure that white men and women, and the Western Culture are obsolete, and under represented in society. Get ready, this is far more than Marxism and Communism.
"...honor the dignity of every human being", huh? I'd like to see their plan for that. Every day we're being divided into various camps ('tribes' seems to be the pet term now, I guess) with little to no regard for individuality and uniqueness. Most of us know where that leads.
How many of you have read the 1992 Agenda 21? It set down the agenda for global governance which the UN, WEF, EU, IMF, etc are following. In 2015 the agenda was updated with important dates for goals to be reached - 2020, 2025, 2030 and 2050. The agenda remains but has been rebranded as the UN 2030 sustainable goals covering the next 15 years. How many have read that? The deep dive was/is 2020 and here we are. Its about breaking down our current social contracts, our culture, our reality and activation of those that really believe that global problems require a global plan with global governance to save the planet. Terrorism started a divide over security vs freedom, Global coolng, global warming, climate change with the threat of mass extinction in 12 years, big tech platforms, censorship, mass migration, Trump comes on the scene and that heats up the politics, civil unrest is added with anarchists, PC speech and identity politics but the global population needed to be pushed right up to the edge of the cliff. Fear and pain physical and/or emotional are very effective tools to drive people. Bill Gates predicting a viral pandemic on Ted Talks and youTube was a start, even the John Hopkins Event 201 10/18/19 an excercise to test for global pandemic preparedness using a coronavirus as the pandemic didn't really have an impact on most people but 6 weeks later sars-coronavirus 2 breaks out. Who was that event really for? Coincidence? Then come travel bans, shutdowns, lockdowns with fear and panic. Then the riots and civil unrest ramp up using race as the flashpoint and the 2020 elections top it off in the US resulting in marked polarization. CV-19 has resulted in polarization of countries around the globe and here we are. I don't believe that we are eachothers enemies but I do believe there are forces, organizations and individuals that do not necessarily represent humanity's best interest especially when humanity becomes a resouce to be controlled and a commodity valued by its ability to be utilized or devalued and discarded. The agenda/plan has been there in plainsight for all to read but do we really get to decide whether we want to participate? I see the word conspiracy used as a catch all term to invalidate people thoughts or ideas as if any of us knows all the answers but its vogue newspeak. Do your own research and decide for yourselves whether global unity without nations states is possible. Given humanity's track record over recorded millenia I question if those who would supposedly be in charge would likely see eye to eye for long.
The answer is mostly ... All Of the Above.
Except Number 3 ...
which is something they will claim but is actually NOT part of the “Concept” its just there to keep the Masses Silent thinking they’re going to be “included” in the “Reset”.
COVID is eagerly being exploited by the NWO-ers for all its worth ... if, in fact, it hasn’t been Whipped Up to an Insane Crisis for JUST THIS REASON. (Remember how it was going to Kill MILLIONS in the USA ALONE?)
The Elite ... the Media ... the Heads of State ... Are using COVID ... and Several Other Things to Shatter and Fragment ANY Form of Social Cohesion.
MASK Mandates ...
ANTI GATHERING Mandates (Applied Unevenly)
LOCKDOWN Mandates ...
KEEP RATCHETING UP THE FEAR!!!
Meanwhile ... Scream CASES Go UP!!! but HOSPITALIZATION and Actual DEATH remain FLAT or go DOWN ...
If WE aren’t being Quick Conditioned to Meekly Jump Through the Hoops that “The POWERS That Be” WANT US To ... WE are Certainly ... WORLDWIDE ... Being “Conditioned” to do SOMETHING.
If somehow COVID gets miraculously “cured” EXPECT something like COVID (New and Improved) to show up.
The People and Agencies that are Extracting POWER from THIS PLANDEMIC aren’t going to be willing to Let Go.
I lean toward an attractive repackaging of socialism on a global scale, which could include many possibilities. It could be something as simple as a global effort to move past COVID which has affected both health and economy, or it could be something more sinister like a secret organization controlling all aspects of humanity through big tech in an Orwellian fashion, and placated to the masses through the use of legalized hard drugs.
Or, it could be neither, and just a pleasing way to make world leaders appear they're eagerly working on issues and we're in good hands, when in fact they're just more heavily funded empty promises.
Still, it's been an interesting rabbit hole to tumble down. Lots of extremely fascinating ways to connect the dots. I'm neither fully convinced or quick to rule out any possibilities.
All of the above and more, effectively making people less accountable for themselves and totally beholden to their government. Equal outcomes, the green new deal, reparations, blah blah blah. Just a bunch of happy horseshit. It would be like having a human resources department for our personal lives as well as at the office.
All of the above. Most have seen the villains in the James Bond movies; well, that is what is coming, not to a theater near you, but to your village, town, city, county, state, national, and world government near you. Oh, so near; like in your face near you. Do your trust your neighbor, your kid, your spouse? When this is in place you will have to answer with an emphatic no!
I actually marked 7 of those choices. The last is meant for 3 other thing not on the list, I'd have to say transhumanism, eugenics, and population control. Oh, but then there's the mega cities too, and the mega regions attracted to the mega cities, which restructures the boundaries of every nation, state, and province. There's so much to thier evil plan.
"the great reset" is like "social justice" "hate speech" "racism" "White Supremacy" - all are arbitrary and can mean almost anything in any given instance according to the individual person who is using the terms.
I tend to think of these terms meaning in reality "all my unhappiness and displeasure is someone elses fault and I want someone else to fix it so that I am no long unhappy and displeased!
This is why when queried the self described SJW cannot intelligibly articulate precisely what it is that they want. They offer no logical much less workable solutions to whatever problem they perceive to be of much importance. All they know is "orange man bad" but they really can't say why.
In simple terms: The Great Reset means "to bring everyone to their knees" - financially, socially & mentally. Scare the shit out of everyone with covid so the first thing they have control over is our health. The rest is a walk in the park for them. Soon we can all be in the same boat - financially, socially & mentally (but not them of course). Sounds wonderful hey?
The Great Reset agenda would have three main components. The first would steer the market toward fairer outcomes. To this end, governments should improve coordination (for example, in tax, regulatory, and fiscal policy), upgrade trade arrangements, and create the conditions for a “stakeholder economy.” At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action.
Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.
The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability. Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ($826 billion) recovery fund. The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans.
Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.
The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges. During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centers; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.
I think it means something good! It means we can go to a better money system that is not FRACTIONAl RESERV Fiat Money. With the system we have, the dollars you have perpetually decrease in value (because they print more) so you are perpetually IN DEBT to the banks (which are NOT your government, but mostly Jew money changers). We need a money system that is less flimsy and more SOLID (like gold used to be). If not gold, at least something that is not so FAITH based. If a large fraction of people lost faith in the dollar it would collapse.
>>>. What we have now is NOT SUSTAINABLE!
>>> i invest in precious metals and my investments have stayed stable throughout the 2008 crises and the Covid crisis
Oversimplified - 'The Great Reset' is NET WORTH EQUALIZATION -
Kamala Harris’ ‘equality of outcome’ video slammed as communism pitch - [nypost.com]
The Left has cultivated a group that, in terms of production, represent the dregs of society. Then, as Kamala Harris said, you focus on outcomes instead of inputs. The 'halving' only has to occur in a couple places to achieve the equalization of net worth.
Education and Housing.
HOUSING - People's homes are typically their largest assets. The housing crisis of 2007-08 was the result of 'giving' that group of people mortgages they did not deserve because they could not afford to pay them. The result? Decrease of YOUR home value and a PAYOUT for these people who were deemed victims of predatory lending.
EDUCATION - If your parents have a job, they make them cosign for you to take out ridiculous loans for useless college degrees that now cost 4X what they did just two decades ago. This group deemed the dregs of society goes for free or nearly free. They also get preferential treatment in the workplace.
The lines of communication, 'technology,' are then used to control you. The lines of communication in this country are already socialist. Big Tech is a social engineering tool.
We were warned about this by Ted Kaczynski, aka 'The Unabomber' in his manifesto 'Industrial Society and Its Future' published in the Washington Post almost 30 years ago. He has a PhD from Harvard and as one of his former class mates recently said about him - if you separate his actions from the academic part of his writing, you will find that nearly everything he wrote about came true.
WE WERE ALL WARNED ABOUT THIS. One way to distract us from this and solidify the Democrat (now Leftist) stronghold on the former Constitutional Republic of The United States is to flood the country with diversity to overtake the American culture who has gotten wise to the fact that the American Dream is a lie. We are controlled now more than ever through taxation and over-regulation in addition to other forms of government overreach. Technology is then used to scrape people off of the digital grid (which is everything) when they do not comply.
The new version of cause and effect, if you will. Smart people understand this. The group considered the dregs of society have been cultivated to NOT accept this. Commit a crime = go to jail. Don't listen to the cop at a routine traffic stop? Get shot. Smart people - criticize they behavior of a non-white male? You must be a racist. Lose your job and get 'cancelled.' Cause and effect.
For the interested parties of this monstrosity, you can read more here. Its the ultimate nightmare, Metrix like Kafka on Wheels cooked up by Klaus "the next Hitler" Schwab.
No property, no privacy: World Economic Forum essay imagines a 2030 communist shift
Klaus Schwab & His Great Fascist Reset
by Winter Oak
Born in Ravensburg in 1938, Klaus Schwab is a child of Adolf Hitler’s Germany, a police-state regime built on fear and violence, on brainwashing and control, on propaganda and lies, on industrialism and eugenics, on dehumanisation and “disinfection”, on a chilling and grandiose vision of a “new order” that would last a thousand years.
Schwab seems to have dedicated his life to reinventing that nightmare and to trying to turn it into a reality not just for Germany but for the whole world.
Worse still, as his own words confirm time and time again, his technocratic fascist vision is also a twisted transhumanist one, which will merge humans with machines in “curious mixes of digital-and-analog life”, which will infect our bodies with “Smart Dust” and in which the police will apparently be able to read our brains.
And, as we will see, he and his accomplices are using the Covid-19 crisis to bypass democratic accountability, to override opposition, to accelerate their agenda and to impose it on the rest of humankind against our will in what he terms a “Great Reset“.
Schwab is not, of course, a Nazi in the classic sense, being neither a nationalist nor an anti-semite, as testified by the $1 million Dan David Prize he was awarded by Israel in 2004.
But 21st century fascism has found different political forms through which to continue its core project of reshaping humanity to suit capitalism through blatantly authoritarian means.
This new fascism is today being advanced in the guise of global governance, biosecurity, the “New Normal”, the “New Deal for Nature” and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”.
Schwab, the octogenarian founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, sits at the centre of this matrix like a spider on a giant web.
The original fascist project, in Italy and Germany, was all about a merger of state and business.
While communism envisages the take-over of business and industry by the government, which – theoretically! – acts in the interests of the people, fascism was all about using the state to protect and advance the interests of the wealthy elite.
Schwab was continuing this approach in a denazified post-WW2 context, when in 1971 he founded the European Management Forum, which held annual meetings at Davos in Switzerland.
Here he promoted his ideology of “stakeholder” capitalism in which businesses were brought into closer co-operation with government.
“Stakeholder capitalism” is described by Forbes business magazine as:
the notion that a firm focuses on meeting the needs of all its stakeholders: customers, employees, partners, the community, and society as a whole.”
Even in the context of a particular business, it is invariably an empty label. As the Forbes article notes, it actually only means that “firms can go on privately shoveling money to their shareholders and executives, while maintaining a public front of exquisite social sensitivity and exemplary altruism”.
But in a general social context, the stakeholder concept is even more nefarious, discarding any idea of democracy, rule by the people, in favour of rule by corporate interests.
Society is no longer regarded as a living community but as a business, whose profitability is the sole valid aim of human activity.
Schwab set out this agenda back in 1971, in his book Moderne Unternehmensführung im Maschinenbau (Modern Enterprise Management in Mechanical Engineering), where his use of the term “stakeholders” (die Interessenten) effectively redefined human beings not as citizens, free individuals or members of communities, but as secondary participants in a massive commercial enterprise.
The aim of each and every person’s life was “to achieve long-term growth and prosperity” for this enterprise – in other words, to protect and increase the wealth of the capitalist elite.
This all became even clearer in 1987, when Schwab renamed his European Management Forum the World Economic Forum.
The WEF describes itself on its own website as “the global platform for public-private cooperation”, with admirers describing how it creates “partnerships between businessmen, politicians, intellectuals and other leaders of society to ‘define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda’.”
The “partnerships” which the WEF creates are aimed at replacing democracy with a global leadership of hand-picked and unelected individuals whose duty is not to serve the public, but to impose the rule of the 1% on that public with as little interference from the rest of us as possible.
In the books Schwab writes for public consumption, he expresses himself in the two-faced clichés of corporate spin and greenwashing.
The same empty terms are dished up time and time again. In Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World Schwab talks of “the inclusion of stakeholders and the distribution of benefits” and of “sustainable and inclusive partnerships” which will lead us all to an “inclusive, sustainable and prosperous future”! 
Behind this bluster, the real motivation behind his “stakeholder capitalism”, which he was still relentlessly promoting at the WEF’s 2020 Davos conference, is profit and exploitation.
For instance, in his 2016 book The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Schwab writes about the Uberisation of work and the consequent advantages for companies, particularly fast-growing start-ups in the digital economy:
As human cloud platforms classify workers as self-employed, they are—for the moment—free of the requirement to pay minimum wages, employer taxes and social benefits”. 
The same capitalist callousness shines through in his attitude towards people nearing the end of their working lives and in need of a well-deserved rest:
Aging is an economic challenge because unless retirement ages are drastically increased so that older members of society can continue to contribute to the workforce (an economic imperative that has many economic benefits), the working-age population falls at the same time as the percentage of dependent elders increases”.
Everything in this world is reduced to economic challenges, economic imperatives and economic benefits for the ruling capitalist class.
The myth of Progress has long been used by the 1% to persuade people to accept the technologies designed to exploit and control us and Schwab plays on this when he declares that “the Fourth Industrial Revolution represents a significant source of hope for continuing the climb in human development that has resulted in dramatic increases in quality of life for billions of people since 1800”.
While it may not feel momentous to those of us experiencing a series of small but significant adjustments to life on a daily basis, it is not a minor change—the Fourth Industrial Revolution is a new chapter in human development, on a par with the first, second and third Industrial Revolutions, and once again driven by the increasing availability and interaction of a set of extraordinary technologies.
But he is well aware that technology is not ideologically neutral, as some like to claim. Technologies and societies shape each other, he says.
After all, technologies are tied up in how we know things, how we make decisions, and how we think about ourselves and each other. They are connected to our identities, worldviews and potential futures. From nuclear technologies to the space race, smartphones, social media, cars, medicine and infrastructure—the meaning of technologies makes them political. Even the concept of a ‘developed’ nation implicitly rests on the adoption of technologies and what they mean for us, economically and socially.
Technology, for the capitalists behind it, has never been about social good but purely about profit, and Schwab makes it quite clear that the same remains true of his Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies are truly disruptive—they upend existing ways of sensing, calculating, organizing, acting and delivering. They represent entirely new ways of creating value for organizations and citizens”.
In case the meaning of “creating value” was not clear, he gives some examples: “Drones represent a new type of cost-cutting employee working among us and performing jobs that once involved real people” and “the use of ever-smarter algorithms is rapidly extending employee productivity—for example, in the use of chat bots to augment (and, increasingly, replace) ‘live chat’ support for customer interactions”.
Schwab goes into some detail about the cost-cutting, profit-boosting marvels of his brave new world in The Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Sooner than most anticipate, the work of professions as different as lawyers, financial analysts, doctors, journalists, accountants, insurance underwriters or librarians may be partly or completely automated…
The technology is progressing so fast that Kristian Hammond, cofounder of Narrative Science, a company specializing in automated narrative generation, forecasts that by the mid-2020s, 90% of news could be generated by an algorithm, most of it without any kind of human intervention (apart from the design of the algorithm, of course).
It is this economic imperative that informs Schwab’s enthusiasm for “a revolution that is fundamentally changing the way we live, work, and relate to one another”.
Schwab waxes lyrical about the 4IR, which he insists is “unlike anything humankind has experienced before”.
Consider the unlimited possibilities of having billions of people connected by mobile devices, giving rise to unprecedented processing power, storage capabilities and knowledge access. Or think about the staggering confluence of emerging technology breakthroughs, covering wide-ranging fields such as artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, the internet of things (IoT), autonomous vehicles, 3D printing, nanotechnology, biotechnology, materials science, energy storage and quantum computing, to name a few. Many of these innovations are in their infancy, but they are already reaching an inflection point in their development as they build on and amplify each other in a fusion of technologies across the physical, digital and biological worlds.
Read the rest of it here: [off-guardian.org]
Or watch : The Great Reset Plan Revealed: How COVID Ushers In The New World Order
Agenda 21 (30) has been in place and agreed since early 90's by all of the nations of those speaking on this thread, 28 years later, mid implementation a few are starting to question it. Globally the lib elite and far left have totally out performed the centre right. Control of media has been key and any opposition to plans in place will be easily managed and next to irrelevant. The 17 objectives such as population control removal of poverty, education for all, protecting the climate etc have, understandably, mass appeal to a western society who have wallowed in soft living for most of the last century. It is seen as particularly appealing to the young who will always see a need for change and improvement and are encouraged to see themselves as deprived and oppressed. They have no knowledge of Mao or Stalin but only know Hitler who has been successfully sold as clear representation of all things right of centre. The majority on here suspect foul play and fear a controlling tyrant but the truth is are powerless to prevent the change already in place. I hear or see angry rants but no reasonable strategy to tackle what is in place and the inevitable journey we are on.
The left has no historical heroes. They tore down statues not just of
conservatives, but also of great progressives such as Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt,
Jefferson, Washington, Jackson, Churchill, Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, Martin Luther King, Frederick Douglass, Hans Hag, Francis Scott Key, and an
Elk. Even Clinton and Obama are not left enough for many democrats.
Leftism, by nature, evolves leftward. There is no limit. It ends in a blue hole
The statues that democrats make of their heroes today will be seen as not
progressive enough by future democrats and will be torn down. Leftists
hate history, in all forms. All they care about is power today.
The left wants to erase all history and replace it with its own
fiction. Factual history is a threat to them. Celebrate history! Make knowledge
of history a secret sign by which conservatives can recognize each other.
Newt Gingrich spices up his lectures with history.
The left wants to straw man historical figures. Instead steel man them.
As far as I'm concerned, Lincoln the badass wrestling president was actually a vampire
hunter. Let's have more movies glorifying historical badasses.
After the Civil War, the North had the sportsmanship to help rebuild the South.
Southern history was glorified in monuments and in the Dukes of Hazzard. The
South lost many people and had their economy destroyed. Had they not suffered
enough? Wasn't the point of the war to reintegrate them? They're your
Leftists are destroying Southern history. They will not be constructive with
The USA was constructive regarding Japan after WW2, and now Japan is a stout ally.
After WW1 Germany was treated punitively, with disastrous results.