Monopoly Jobs
by Joe Kelley
2-8-2022

The single source of National money leads to a single source of pay-to-play opportunities as dictated by the one Monopoly Totalitarian Dictatorship Admiral.

One knows one is under Admiralty Law, Totalitarian Dictatorship, when power flows from the employed to the employer in only one direction, all roads, as the saying goes, lead to Rome.

Call it Empire instead of Totalitarian Dictatorship and the name of it changes while the same shit happens every same shitty day.

Out with the old Fearless Leader to make room for the new one, changing the names on the Central Hub where all power flows from all parts of the world where power is created, and a new day starts with a new name, same old shit-eating days on and on for as long as the Final Solution takes to solve itself naturally until the last Rat eventually eats the second to last Rat on the ship sunk on purpose.

Not until Global Monopoly stamps out all competition will the Final Solution tale place, and meanwhile, there are as yet to dominate competitor Nation-States, Empires, Totalitarian Dictatorships, Imperial Kingdumbs, whatnot, all having different names, all doing the same things routinely, all leading the that Final Solution to that Rat Infestation problem infecting mankind.

No more federated republics allowed. 

Competition always wins, until all competition is finally snuffed out, eaten, by that last Rat.

What is my job today, fearless master?

I, me, this one here typing, is still allowed to look internally to answer that question, having won my independence of thought despite monopoly forces dictating otherwise, but independence of thought is very strictly against Roman Civil Rules, or Admiralty Law, by any name whatsoever, including Exchequer, Chancery, Equity, Admiralty, and now Family versions of the treasonous fraud monopoly business. Each monopoly competitor confesses with the two sets of books. One for me, negative one for you. Rules that do not pass the laugh test of morality, not without deep burrowing into the dungeons of torturous falsehoods, rationalizations, euphemisms, false flags, dogma, rote parroting of slogans, etc.

Central Command insists, by natural laws, that there cannot be competition, if there is competition, there is a new name on the Central Command official paperwork.

What is my job today, peerless master?

For a few dollars more, you may have, for your job today, a non-competitive job, parroting slogans by rote, or, let me see, what is on the Monopoly List of things not yet done to consolidate power from all parts of the world to Central Command…

Hmmmmmmm...

What a conundrum, running out of ideas, what to do, what to do, ah, here we go, a mole there, whack that one, then dear slave, return post haste for more work that must be done by you, for me.

"First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency.

"It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount.

"If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefore of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks.

"This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product.

"Thus the same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up. But this is not all. Down will go profits also. For merchants, instead of buying at high prices on credit, will borrow money of the banks at less than one per cent., buy at low prices for cash, and correspondingly reduce the prices of their goods to their customers. And with the rest will go house-rent. For no one who can borrow capital at one per cent. with which to build a house of his own will consent to pay rent to a landlord at a higher rate than that. Such is the vast claim made by Proudhon and Warren as to the results of the simple abolition of the money monopoly.”
Benjamin Tucker, State Socialism and Anarchism:
HOW FAR THEY AGREE, AND WHEREIN THEY DIFFER, 1888

Benny was not following that script. Josiah Warren did not follow a script either, but I am not so sure about Proudhon and his translator.

"Another of Proudhon's startling paradoxes, seemingly so at least, and I think we shall see really so, is the use of the term anarchy, to denote not chaos and confusion, but the basis of order in the freedom of the individual from the control of others. Etymologically, this use of the term has a show of reason as it merely means absence of government, and a writer has the right, if he choose so to revert to etymological origins; and frequently there is a great advantage in so doing. There is a loss it is true in the temporary obfuscation of the mind of the reader, but, it may be, a more than compensating advantage in arousing deeper thought, or in furnishing a securer technicality. But in this ease the disadvantage is certainly incurred; and neither advantage is secured. There are two very different things covered by the term government: personal government by arbitrium, and the government of inherent laws and principles. Proudhon is denying the rightfulness of the former, and affirming the latter. Now the Greek arche meant both of these things; but if either more peculiarly than the other, it meant the government of laws and principles, whence the negation of such rule by the prefix an has meant, and rightly means, chaos. Proudhon undertakes to make the Greek word mean exclusively the other idea, whereby he spoils one excellent technicality without getting for his other purpose a secure and good one in place of it."
Proudhon and his Translator
The Index July 23, 1876, Steven Pearl Andrews

The point being, with the title, is the point at which a better mousetrap idea finds a way into a human soul, and action is then done to offer that competitive, higher quality, and lower-cost alternative to all, or at least to fearless, peerless, leader. The one blessed with the idea is an individual source of power, a power that can flow to Central Command if people allow their mice brains to be taken and controlled from the same Central Command Post. If it is good for the individual in defense of the individual from external control, such as would be a working bullshit detector, then it is the END of Central Command.

Witch list is that job going to be on?

Caveat Emptor