Extreme Empathy II
by Joe Kelley
THE PERCEPTION OF FREEDOM
“...the Law of Jente...”
Freedom from enforcers of the Law of Jente requires the discovery of one’s subjection to it, then validation of the discovery of one’s subjection to the Law of Jente, and then one prosecutes the remedy required to free oneself from subjection to the Law of Jante.
Free at last, founded upon accurate accountability, responsibility, and the truth that matters in each case.
One must defend against that which is conscientiously objectionable if it is in one’s power to do so. One cannot be free if one is kidnapped and forced into an Infantile State of blind belief in falsehood without question.
The Ten Rules of Jante
How does that compare to the following?
XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”
If one was basically the same thing as the other one would both be totalitarian dictatorships? Each one is as dictatorial as the other one, and both are diametrically the opposite of conscientious objections to blind obedience to criminal orders issued by criminals.
Go one way, traveling the monopoly path of the blindingly obedient, one can no longer object to further travel going that way, not by moral conscience and not by reason. There is no other way once one abandons one’s own power to adjudicate the facts that matter in every case. Once one begins going this way, the blindly obedient way, one cannot choose NOT to keep going this way, unless orders are issued to stop going this way, and then orders are issued to go in any direction whatsoever, while the blindly obedient await further orders to follow without question. Time will tell, each one going this way may, or may not, be told to make their own moral decisions, but with lack of use, that power may clearly evaporate, but not clearly in view of oneself, only obvious to a disinterested or objective observer.
The other way, the independent way, is decided upon independently, as one moves from independent decision making to independent decision making each step of the way. One can follow moral suggestions, discovering moral paths offered by other moral people, subject to consequences for errors or omissions that bear out to be costs paid for by those moral people who create those burdens themselves, trials and tribulations, along the moral path, due to basic human error. One can learn from mistakes, as well as one learns from successes, growing greater powers of accurate discernment along the way, paying all costs of errors themselves, responsibly, and based upon discoveries, validations, and prosecutions of the facts that merit corrective behavior. Do not infringe upon natural rights any further, doing so is too costly, too costly for those bearing those costs, which are costs accurately accountable to those who create those costs themselves.
Preserve the feedback loop, accept the costs created by the creator of those costs, do not blame the victim.
Those actually responsible for bad decisions made, respond to errors according to the facts that merit adjustments in behavior, so as to avoid further costs, such as, for example, a bad decision by someone WHO makes someone else pay for the mistakes made by the responsible individual making those bad decisions. Is someone less likely to adjust their own behavior when they make themselves believe that their own mistakes are free of all costs? When clearly the victim being made to pay for the bad decisions of someone else, is clearly not a responsible act, clearly not accountable, as decisions that are made by someone else cause injury to a victim, and the only one capable of deciding not to cause those injuries to the victim is the criminal who is responsible for those injuries to that victim. False blame fraudulently attached by a predator to their prey, blaming the victim, clearly causes injury to the predator, as the predator begins to destroy their own feedback loop of corrective behavior.
Madam, the slaves are in revolt, we stole all their liberty.
Let them eat cake and drive electric cars!
Fraudulent claims of free stuff are merely units of loot stolen by criminals, one calorie at a time, one once of blood followed by another ounce, as criminals prey upon defenseless victims, and blaming the victim merely leads the criminal continually down the one-way road to their own destruction, bringing all of humanity along with them on the misled path.
Accurate accountability of the facts that merit a defensive cause at law goes out the window one victim at a time expanding out rapidly from Ground Zero and from Patient Zero infected with irresponsible and unaccountable predation.
Soon all of humanity is rendered defenselessly following criminal orders without question.
Even in military codes the followers of moral military orders are duty-bound to question immoral dictatorial orders JUST in case an enemy of all that is moral, and all that is good, has taken over the leadership positions in the military, turning the rank and file military officers all against each other, as the criminal dictator dictating from a military dictatorship is no better, and potentially worse, than the worst dictator running the worst dictatorship in all of inhuman history, and that BAR has already been set very high by the likes of Roman Emperors such as Caligula.
There are precedents, statutes, codes, and laws against JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS, and that is for morally justifiable reasons.
If one is incapable of accurately discriminating moral right from moral left or good from evil, one is unfit for military duty, one could be turned by any change in the wind direction, turned against their own fellow members of their duty-bound military unit of defense.
Friendly fire and collateral damage the rule, not the exception.
A strong unit of fellow moral defenders could be infected by one weak link in the chain, the worst individual member of the moral defending unit being the one elected to the leadership position. If the one elected to the leadership position turns their coat to predator instead of defender, and there is no code of conduct enforced by each independent defender, then the entire unit is condemned to live as a unit of predator drones armed with artificial intelligence. They can no longer even discover that they are malevolent, evil predators, as they are all just following orders without question, all being led toward their collective torturous suicide, now called Omnicide.
There must be a means by which each individual is found to pass muster, at every level, in every moral unit, of any size, as each individual member of the unit moves in any direction as directed by any power of will whatsoever.
Even Google, which is artificial intelligence, by the way, offers:
be accepted as adequate or satisfactory.
"a treaty that might pass muster with the voters"
Unfit to vote in an election, unfit to vote as an independent private prosecutor with Attorney General legal powers, unfit to vote as an independent county criminal grand jury member, and unfit to pass voir dire proceedings to be then validated as a fit member of a defensive unit, fitted and authorized to vote as a trial juror in a trial by jury criminal proceeding that proceeds according to the law of the land, the Ancient Law, the common law, the unwritten law, in Latin it was called Legem Terrae, and it must be the voices of the moral people as individuals cooperate to reach the same goal as all moral people willfully intend to defend innocent human beings from guilty inhuman beings.
“French for "to speak the truth." The process through which potential jurors from the venire are questioned by either the judge or a lawyer to determine their suitability for jury service. Also the preliminary questioning of witnesses (especially experts) to determine their competence to testify. See, e.g. Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991).”
Cornell Law School
Legal Information Institute
The name "voir dire" attempts to codify a natural law process, but the process is merely the manifestation of moral conscience. One either objects to or does not object to funding their own miserable path to self-evident self-destruction of self and by extension, all of humanity as human beings are bribed, defrauded, kidnapped, and forced to labor for predators, tortured for false confessions, or all the human conscientious objectors are mass murdered from the rapidly declining collective sum total of humanity, made inhuman by immoral choices that include the choice to abdicate moral responsibility and ignore the evidence that merits accurate accountability.
Discover Patient Zero at Ground Zero, validate the facts that merit the defensive cause at law, and prosecute the criminal case according to the law of the land, then move on to the next worst Treasonous Fraud expediently, before the next victim falls into that Infantile State.
YOU can decide to object to just following immoral orders without question for as long as you nurture, and responsibly maintain, that moral adjudicating power within your own human soul.
Give up on your own moral compass and sure as Satan, YOU will get your reward.