Supply and Demand:
Scarcity of Volunteers:
Glut of Dictators:

Who demands an increase in the already oversupplied number of dictators?

How many people are led to believe that their duty in government is to vote for the next dictator, and then get back to work to pay their taxes?

Is it true that a dictator running a dictatorship must preform some essential duties or failing to do so the rate at which the dictatorship will sink will increase beyond the desired rate?

Example:
Dictators running dictatorships must, as a rule, incorporate into the dictatorship a number of co-dictators. One dictator, as a rule, is not enough power to enforce dictates upon every ONE else.

Dictators will extort those who can be extorted, murder those who can’t be extorted, and incorporate those who will aid in accomplishing those duties on schedule.

Now, moving on, how about some reasonable concerns concerning the questions and answers facing dictators and their victims?

If dictators start running out of people who produce anything worth extorting and dictators accumulate too many fellow dictator associates the inevitable sinking of the dictatorship crosses a line, a point of no return, and the rate at which the rats eat each other to occupy the rapidly diminishing floating parts of the dictatorship, increases. Those parts of the dictatorship that still sustain the lives of the rats, sink into the ocean of despair, as all those who were still able to produce anything worth stealing have long since been murdered, and rats will eat each other to save their own sorry asses when push comes to shove, might makes right in the rat world.

Rats, as a rule, don’t know how to patch the hole in the ship, let alone make it.

Voluntary cooperation for any productive goal has to be the natural order before some criminal genius can then cook up a recipe that sinks the ship, a step by step method that places the rat on top of the rat pyramid, where the crew is made to row to shore, or die to save the rat cracking the whip. The rat has to have fellow rats, it is a rule of order.

The loot must be shared. The looters must borrow some rules of natural order that determine agreeable cooperation in voluntary associations or the looters will not be able to agree to voluntarily cooperate for mutual offense against those who produce anything worth stealing.

Looters collecting loot share rules that work to help looters cooperate to reach their shared goal of looting those who produce anything worth stealing.

What governs the rate at which the looters increase in number, what is their shared rule?

If you are reading this and you are pointing the finger at me claiming that I am some sort of conspiracy theorist, an enemy of the state, a criminal, an agitator, a rebel seeking a cause, an insurgent, even a terrorist fomenting rebellion, then you have an opportunity to look in the mirror and see what you are at that point in that place.

There is a use for a dead language known as Latin. Some phrases survive, such as cui bono: who benefits?

A member of the dictatorship having uninhibited access to the National Loot FUND can double that measure of Power to Purchase at will. That means, in real terms, that the total number of units currently existing can be doubled at will. That means that as much Power to Purchase as is already in existing control of everyone can be created arbitrarily by that member of the dictatorship having uninhibited access to the National Loot FUND. As much power to buy things as everyone else combined can be a known amount of Power to Purchase, and those on top of the dictatorship can simply add that same amount to their exclusive bank account, and they have done so on the Public Record.

XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”