Checkmate?

[brandnewtube.com]

Loose lips, sink ships?

[healthimpactnews.com]

In the first video above the lady mentions lawsuits. She also claims that you have authority “under” The Constitution and The Bill of Rights.

We are not under that bus. Don’t throw me under that bus, please.

The lady also suggests that you should “...tell them that you have sovereignty..”

The Constitution gives no one sovereignty. The Bill of Rights gives no one sovereignty. Clearly this woman is parroting a false narrative that is self-contradictory.

Why are so many people being misled by false narratives that are self-contradictory?

Here, once again, is an example of someone using their equal protection under the same voluntary association LAW:

“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”

That was a victim of a crime known as slavery in 1781 in Massachusetts taking her case before 12 jurors in a trial by jury case.

That is before The Constitution of 1789.

That is before The National Judiciary Act of 1789.

That is before the Bill of Rights amended The Constitution of 1789.

Setting aside the serious problem of people being misled to Civil Suits instead of affording people their equal protection against criminals in Criminal Cases, for now setting that misleading mistake caused by false authority over law powers aside, the LAW was shown in the 1781 case to be commanded by the victim so as to afford the victim the defense needed in a case of enslavement by a criminal slaver. The woman decided she was not a slave, and the woman set herself free, and the means to do so was a trial by jury case, where she took her case to 12 jurors. All those 12 jurors did was to acknowledge the fact that the woman was self-evidently free, as was the facts that mattered in the recent attempt to enslave all Americans under British Rule: The Revolutionary War.

People dying is a cause for action. People volunteering to add their individual power (call it sovereignty and YOU will be called a Conspiracy Theorist, demonized, judged, convicted, and sentenced by “The Media” ) to defend people not yet dead by the same cause of death. And from grass-roots, organically, people create a government position known as coroner. How did that member of civilized society die?

The Cause to Act in Defense is a pile of bodies.

The best that people can do is blame the cause of death on a new version of the flu, and then to defend people not dead yet those in authority offer an experimental RNA treatment to defend against a new version of flu, and that is the best that people can do, in Modern Times.

But wait, now there are a lot more people thrown onto the pile of dead bodies, and so there is now a new Cause to Act in Defense.

Where are the published findings of the local coroner? What is the cause of death for those people now thrown onto the growing pile of dead people, and is the report being reported by the coroner going to hold up in a Court of Law if the case warrants by probable cause a Criminal Trial before a Trial Jury according to the real Law of the Land?

Oh, no, that can’t happen, no, no, no, not since 1789 and the Judiciary Act, and despite all the other words reported in all the other documents, including the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights.

The age old bait and switch routine used on the slaves in Ancient Times works on the slaves in Modern Times. Out goes your power you were born with, your moral conscience, your need to defend yourself and the rest of civilized society if you so choose to help, and in place are the very criminals that are murdering you.

So the idea is to go to those criminals pleading for mercy?

How does that work in the real world? At the top of the criminal organization are the worst of the worst evil monsters ever to have disgraced the human gene pool, and now they are in the Lab working on Modifying Genetics. They consume their human property as they see fit, experimenting on human beings, and they do so for money? Does power please them? If one of their victims pleads for mercy are they expected to suddenly grow a human moral conscience?

The coroner would take evidence to a member of a Grand Jury. The coroner would be a paid employee of the government. The member of a Grand Jury would not be a paid employee of the government. The coroner would tend to be biased toward the hand that feeds the employee, meaning The People who voluntarily pay into, invest into, a government power for defense of The People. The members of the Grand Jury are afforded all lawful jurisdiction civil and criminal for a number of reasons, and they are not paid out of The Public Fund for obvious reasons that have historically become obvious reasons over time, as people become complacent, apathetic, or otherwise fall down on their civic duties as volunteers helping each other defend each other from all enemies foreign and domestic.

What if the government starts a money counterfeiting scam and they have all the money they ever wanted by merely adding zeros to their account, and then they start buying coroners and members of the grand jury?

1. Dead bodies = a new form of flu virus, perhaps, not yet confirmed by Koch's Postulates The Gold Standard for identifying a new virus = A Cause to Act in Defense = Action in Defense = Build up your immune system if needed, take vitamin A, C, and D supplements if needed, Consider Medical Treatments offered such as Antibodies, Antivirals, Ivermectin, Steroids, Chlorine Dioxide, as prescribed by competent medical personnel = Do as your told by criminals counterfeiting government offices.

2. Dead bodies = people doing what they are told by criminals counterfeiting government offices take an experimental RNA treatment = A Cause to Act in Defense = wait for the criminals counterfeiting government offices to do something about the rising death toll = ask criminals counterfeiting government for permission to do something about the rising death toll.

3. Criminals Counterfeiting Government Offices failing on all fronts to do something about the rising death toll or worse, their criminal orders cause the rising death toll to rise = Cause to Act in Defense

There are 2 versions of due process of law, one is tried and true, moved forward from Ancient History dating back at least to The Golden Rule, and then there is the counterfeit version where people follow every order without question issued by a small number of very powerful people.

If the coroner is on the take, the evidence that accurately identifies the cause of death will be falsified on purpose. That is a Cause to Act in Defense. The coroner in question would be guilty of a very serious crime and actual due process of law would move the first evidence of the crime to a grand juror so as to then move into validation of the accusation on behalf of the accuser and The Public, and the Grand Jury, with all jurisdiction Civil and Criminal, if the evidence warrants Defense of The Public, move the Criminal Case to Trial by Jury, moving the accuser/private prosecutor, and the accused/defendant, before the representatives of The People: the Trial Jurors.

1. Bodies piling up from a flu, perhaps
2. Bodies piling up from an experimental RNA treatment claimed to, but failing to, treat the unidentified flu
3. NO GOVERNMENT OFFICE AT ALL ACTING IN DEFENSE

All it would take is one coroner, one private prosecutor, the grand jury, and then the trial jurors to set us free from the murderous psychopaths misleading everyone into miserable extinction. But, hell, lets go with door number 2.

Door 1: The Actual Law Power
Door 2: The Counterfeit Law Power