Standing Outside the Rules
Standing Inside the Rules
Standing Outside the Laws
Standing Inside the Laws

Standing Outside the Rules and Laws (Not possible = mutually exclusive)
Standing Inside the Rules and Laws (Think Senate and House)
Standing Outside the Laws while Standing Inside the Rules (Top Down)
Standing Outside the Rules while Standing Inside the Laws (Liberty)

Rulers Rule = Involuntary
Lawful Law = Voluntary

Do you lead?

Do you follow?

Are you responsible?

Are you irresponsible?

Golden Rule or Chancellor's Foot

That is a lead-in to those who at least have control over their mathematical brains, perhaps along the lines of common sense.

Courts of Law, those three words, not long ago meant common law courts, of, by, and for the defense of life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness, and the power to defend all.

The lead-in – above – leads into the relatively complex relationship between voluntary association – Liberty – and that which opposes – does not equal Liberty, does not Equal Liberty, Organized Crime opposes, is outside, Liberty. crime: The Legal Fiction State opposes Liberty.

Involuntary Association is Outside Voluntary Association

The State, or Legal Fiction, which is Organized Crime hidden behind Rulers Ruling Empire, by any other fraudulent legalese, any name whatsoever, it is still Roman Civil Rules, it is still Organized Crime, and it is dependent upon deception, extortion, and subjugation of those inside the law, but inside their Rules, known historically as The Slaves – the subjugation of slaves - Under Roman Civil Rulers using Roman Civil Rules.

Rulers Over Slaves
Slaves Under Rulers
No Slaves No Rulers Inside The Law of Voluntary Association
Rulers Ruling Slaves Inside Roman Civil Rules of Enforced Involuntary Association enforced as deception, Fraud, threat of aggressive harm, Extortion, and Treason against The Law: Out Side The Law = Outlaw

The lead-in leads into the historical evidence proving the case beyond reasonable doubt, but only to those still in command of their power of reason. Those outside the power of their own reason are The Slaves, and they exclude themselves from their own power of reason, their own accountability, their power to think: to think is the power to act independently, such as an independent acknowledgment of the fact that the criminals own the plantation. Having lost the power to think leads in to the loss of the power to act, such as the independent acknowledgment of the fact that funding organized criminals make the criminals more powerful and The Slaves less powerful with each unit of power transferred from The Slaves to Organized Criminals.

Once The Slaves are enslaved by the Order to Obey, and they Obey the Order to Stand Outside The Law and Remain Inside Rules (where they alone are protected from their punishments) The Slaves will then Obey this Order and any other Order after they are Ordered to stop Thinking about defending themselves from without.

Do Not Defend Yourself with Independent Reason
Defense is a prerogative exception to The Law affording Monopoly Over Reason to ONE

Independence is outside a voluntary dependence upon Organized Crime. You want your piece of the action knowingly, unknowingly, reluctantly, or with enthusiasm, so you pay the fee to Gamble Liberty Away. They won’t make an example of me, not for a few more years, according to what I’m told. There is plenty more weaker slaves than me so far.

Roman Civil Rules in Courts of a different name than a Court of Law protects and serves the Rulers.

How is that not clear to someone who continues to have control of their power of reason?

Conceived in Liberty, Murray Rothbard
“When the constitutional procedures of the common law were applied, there could be few convictions for smuggling by juries of ordinary people, who shared in the common interest as sufferers from taxes and monopoly, and hence in the common enthusiasm for smuggling. To circumvent the constitutional courts of common law, the prerogative High Court of Admiralty was established to absorb the jurisdictions of the maritime courts of the seaports, which had administered the traditional sea law and law merchant. Page 10

“To overcome the protections afforded defendants in common-law trials, the punishment for violating New Laws was placed by the Privy Council into the hands of the prerogative courts, where prisoners could be tortured and were deprived of the benefits of trial by jury. The Court of Star Chamber also developed censorship to control the reading of the people, and the laws of seditious and slanderous libel to protect the government from criticism. Page 25

“Smith has been referred to as the greatest “merchant-prince” of his year, but it is clear that his status and wealth arose not from private trade, but from the governmental privileges of tax-farming and grants of monopoly.”
Page 31

A Court of Law, not too long ago, was clearly divorced from a Court of Admiralty, or Equity, or Family, or so-called Traffic, as in: Human Trafficking.

George Mason, 1787
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”

The Unconstitutionality of Criminal Jury Selection Brittany L. Deitch
"Currently, the prosecution and defense share equal control over jury selection. Looking to the literal text of the Sixth Amendment, the landmark case on the right to a jury trial, and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for guidance, this Article explains that jury selection procedures undermine the defendant-protection rationale for the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. Because the Sixth Amendment grants this right personally to the defendant and the Supreme Court has construed this right as intending to protect the defendant from governmental overreach, the prosecution should not be entitled to select the very jury that is supposed to serve as a check against its power. After concluding that symmetrical power in jury selection undermines the constitutional purpose of the jury trial, this Article proposes two possible remedies."

Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States.”