Treason by Fraud II
by Joe Kelley
3-6-2022

Legal Fiction is as much a whole truth as it is a half-truth, which is a confession of the facts that matter in either case of Legal Fiction creation and employment or use. 

The original idea is to communicate a body of people belonging within a set of specific attributes, characteristics, accurate measurements, agreeable thought and actions, ideologies, spiritual commonalities, or any common trait binding people together into one collective whole, and the word, or label used to collectively communicate each individual belonging to each group, is the original idea to create and use a Legal Fiction. 

For example, people who share a common desire to rape innocent victims are called rapists, however, one does not join the club until there is an actual rape victim raped by the rapist. One does not truly know what goes on in another one's mind at any moment in time each moment each day, but actions are accountable factually when accounts are accounted accurately by some tried and true method of holding people to their accurately accounted for actions accountable to those individuals themselves. 

Follow the counterfeit money back to the counterfeiter, follow the serial rape victims back to the serial rapist. Counterfeiters are a Legal Fiction Collective Group. Rapists are a Legal Fiction Collective Group. Serial Rapists are a Legal Fiction Collective Group. Treasonous Frauds don't exist, just ask them. 

To belong in the Legal Fiction group of rapists each member of the rapist Legal Fiction group has raped someone, and the act of raping someone places the rapist in the Legal Fiction group of rapists. The facts matter to the rapists desiring a victim. The facts matter to the rape victim not desiring to be raped. 

The Legal Fiction idea is to communicate that there is in fact more than one individual on earth in human history that has raped someone and therefore all those who have raped someone in the past, are raping someone as I type, or will move onto the next rape victim sooner or later, are all those names of all those rapists that belong in the rapist group, belonging in the rapist group because they rape people.

Rapists are a Legal Fiction Collective Category. Treasonous Frauds are not. 

Yet. 

What happens if the idea of a Legal Fiction is used to perpetrate a fraud instead of a Legal Fiction used for the original purpose of having a label used to identify all the people belonging within a category of people, or Group of people, because all those people, all having individual names, have done whatever was done to place each individual in that Group accurately, by accounting for the facts that matter in each case? 

Take 100 rapists, all having raped people, and instead of having to name each rapist by name, someone uses the Legal Fiction idea to communicate the Group of all the rapists merely by using the Legal Fiction Collectivization of all those names as if all those individuals are belonging in one single Group having one single name or label. 

One individual using the Legal Fiction original meaning points to someone else and claims that there is a rapist, and everyone knows that the one pointed at may be guilty of rape as claimed by the accuser. 

How about the Legal Fiction Group having the Legal Fiction label False Accuser?

No such Legal Fiction Category for False Accuser, same as Treasonous Fraud, no such thing, it does not exist, ask them and they will prove it beyond reasonable doubt. 

False Accuser was a popularly known Legal Fiction Category with a different Legal Fiction label. Libeler or Slanderer was once a commonly employed Legal Fiction label, but that was Antiquated due to the removal of Independent Grand Jury proceedings, which, by the way, is a Treasonous infringement of natural rights, see Bill of Rights V for one example record recorded on The Public Record as to the Legal Fiction employment of Grand Jurors in Grand Juries during Due Process of Law, The Law of The Land, and the common law, once known as Legem Terrae.  

100 Rapists belong in the Legal Fiction Group of Rapists because they all have raped people, thereby belonging to the Rapist Group, each and every one of them has raped a rape victim, each rapist has an individual name, each rape victim has an individual name, each concerned member of The People as a whole can hear the word Rapist and be made aware of the fact that there is more than one named individual rioting in the blood of the innocent, and therefore the Legal Fiction Grouping of individuals into a collective Group of Rapists is useful in warning The Public of the clear and present dangers that The Public faces, in the face of 100 Rapists, all having names, all having raped people, as a matter of fact, and a matter of Record on The Public Record at the fingertips of The Public. 

Now, added to the Legal Fiction Rapists Group, if "we" all follow along in this reasoning, is the first and so far only False Accuser to have ever in human history made a false accusation, so there is then, at that future date, only One individual with One name placed on a True Bill by One Grand Jury, and that may lead to One Court Date where One False Accuser is found to be making a False Accusation against an innocent individual, and the adjudication of that One Case was concluded by One Trial Juror who was one of 12 Trial Jurors in that Trial by Jury case of False Accusation. 

How did that one False Accuser get placed on that one True Bill by those Grand Jurors in that one case on that future date in human history on Earth? 

One of the individuals on a Trial Jury, someone having a name, saw through the evidence demanded by the 12 jurors, and that one juror saw that the facts proved that the accuser was making a false accusation in the case being tried by those 12 jurors and that one, lone, trial juror refused to convict the innocent accused, which then led to the accurate identification of the first and so far only False Accuser ever to falsely accuse someone on this planet. 

Stare decisis, or precedence, is then at the fingertips of The People, for the people in their defense against any future False Accusers, where there is only one name, one face, one known False Accuser ever to have falsely accused anyone on Earth, a fact found during a trial where a false accuser was using government to punish an innocent individual, each having individual names. 

Since there is only one False Accuser ever, in this reasonable message I am typing and someone else may be reading, each of us imaginary people having names, and since there is only one imaginary False Accuser, in this exercise of brainpower, is there then a need to create a Legal Fiction Category for just one imaginary False Accuser that doesn't exist? 

The Legal Fiction Category of False Accuser, if you look it up in The Public Records, at your fingertips because you are a member of The Public, has no name, no face, no Trial Transcript, because that one time one case of a false accuser attempting to use Government to cause injury to an innocent individual was never accused of doing anything wrong by anyone ever.  That one and only lone false accuser, and in the Trial Transcripts for that one case where only one Juror had figured it out, figuring it out beyond a reasonable doubt, and the falsely accused individual was set free by that one juror that one time, where that one juror refused to convict an innocent individual. 

Who is credited with having failed to bring the false accuser up on charges of false accusation, or Treasonous Fraud for that matter? 

The point of Legal Fiction in the original version was to hold people to an accurate accounting of the facts that matter in any criminal case that threatens The People as a whole. 

"A federal, or rather a national city, ten miles square, containing a hundred square miles, is about four times as large as London; and for forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings, congress may possess a number of places or towns in each state. It is true, congress cannot have them unless the state legislatures cede them; but when once ceded, they never can be recovered. And though the general temper of the legislatures may be averse to such cessions, yet many opportunities and advantages may be taken of particular times and circumstances of complying assemblies, and of particular parties, to obtain them. It is not improbable, that some considerable towns or places, in some intemperate moments, or influenced by anti-republican principles, will petition to be ceded for the purposes mentioned in the provision. There are men, and even towns, in the best republics, which are often fond of withdrawing from the government of them, whenever occasion shall present. The case is still stronger. If the provision in question holds out allurements to attempt to withdraw, the people of a state must ever be subject to state as well as federal taxes; but the federal city and places will be subject only to the latter, and to them by no fixed proportion. Nor of the taxes raised in them, can the separate states demand any account of congress. These doors opened for withdrawing from the state governments entirely, may, on other accounts, be very alluring and pleasing to those anti-republican men who prefer a place under the wings of courts.

"If a federal town be necessary for the residence of congress and the public officers, it ought to be a small one, and the government of it fixed on republican and common law principles, carefully enumerated and established by the constitution. it is true, the states, when they shall cede places, may stipulate that the laws and government of congress in them shall always be formed on such principles. But it is easy to discern, that the stipulations of a state, or of the inhabitants of the place ceded, can be of but little avail against the power and gradual encroachments of the union. The principles ought to be established by the federal constitution, to which all states are parties; but in no event can there be any need of so large a city and places for forts, etc. , totally exempted from the laws and jurisdictions of the state governments.

"If I understand the constitution, the laws of congress, constitutionally made, will have complete and supreme jurisdiction to all federal purposes, on every inch of ground in the United States, and exclusive jurisdiction on the high seas, and this by the highest authority, the consent of the people. Suppose ten acres at West Point shall be used as a fort of the union, or a sea port town as a dockyard: the laws of the union, in those places, respecting the navy, forces of the union, and all federal objects, must prevail, be noticed by all judges and officers, and executed accordingly. And I can discern no one reason for excluding from these places, the operation of state laws, as to mere state purpose for instance, for the collection of state taxes in them; recovering debts; deciding questions of property arising within them on state laws; punishing, by state laws, theft, trespasses, and offenses committed in them by mere citizens against the state law.

"The city, and all the places in which the union shall have this exclusive jurisdiction, will be immediately under one entire government, that of the federal head, and be no part of any state, and consequently no part of the United States. The inhabitants of the federal city and places, will be as much exempt from the laws and control of the state governments, as the people of Canada or Nova Scotia will be. Neither the laws of the states respecting taxes, the militia, crimes of property, will extend to them; nor is there a single stipulation in the constitution, that the inhabitants of this city, and these places, shall be governed by laws founded on principles of freedom. All questions, civil and criminal, arising on the laws of these places, which must be the laws of congress, must be decided in the federal courts; and also, all questions that may, by such judicial fictions as these courts may consider reasonable, be supposed to arise within this city, or any of these places, may be brought into these courts. By a very common legal fiction, any personal contract may be supposed to have been made in any place. A contract made in Georgia may be supposed to have been made in the federal city; the courts will admit the fiction. . . . " Richard Henry Lee, 6th President of the United States of America in Congress Assembled, writing in opposition to the National (1789) Constitution. 

Criminal usurpation by "legal fiction."

Caveat Emptor