This is now a means to an end.

The idea is to work out a court case, and do so according to the common law. People can join in as if they are volunteering to use the means to the end.

Due to current situations I will not pose the court case that would sweep the top step first, which would be a court case involving the most powerful individual (or individuals, in separate court cases) running the Central Banking Fraud in America: a.k.a The FED. Instead the idea here is to work on a much needed failure of modern science, which is the accurate identification of the cause of the demand for a poisonous vaccine shot injected into every single living human being now, or ever to be, on the Earth.

To that end I want to suggest the following pre-trial discovery:

Notice of Liability

It is important to see clearly that the above works defensively, as a shield, so the idea here is to set up a defense, a foundation, and then once secure on the foundation, the idea will then turn toward the sword, which is the use of the tool (the law) to discover, to contact, and to deal with specific, named, clear and present dangers that warrant prosecution for cause.

The Notice of Liability can be traced back to the Declaration of Independence.

See for example the following additional methods of building that defensive foundation:

Solemn Recognition of Mixed War:
"When a state, by and through its officials and agents, deprives a citizen of all of his remedies by the due process of law and deprives the citizen of the equal protection of the law, the state commits an act of mixed war against the citizen, and, by its behavior, the state declares war on the citizen. The citizen has the right to recognize this act by the publication of a solemn recognition of mixed war. This writing has the same force as the Declaration of Independence. It invokes the citizen's U.S. constitutional 9th and 10th so-called amend guarantees of the right to create an effective remedy where otherwise none exists."

The Commercial Lien Right and The Military Lien Right
"In American history, the Declaration of Independence served the legal purpose of making a Solemn Recognition of Mixed War, which is a Notice of Military Lien Right, a warning of No Trespass, an assertion that any killing or taking of human life necessary for the protection of the legal remedies of the common citizen is being done, in the immediate situation described in the Solemn Recognition or Notice, not as murder, but as lethal self-defense of the commercial and social remedy against the cited domestic enemy or enemies. The Declaration of Independence is the legal model or format for the construction of the Solemn Recognition of Mixed War and the Notice of Military Lien Right."

I can link the sources of those words above, but the idea here is to know the principles that work during the power struggle whereby there is a natural order of peace and prosperity that is willfully destroyed (one step at a time or all at once) by enemies of that natural order of peace and prosperity, and those people who constitute that clear and present danger (each of those people) cause defenders to act in defense: a cause of action if you will.

To reinforce this concept of cause and effect, for those who want an official source to quote, the following says the same thing as those messages above:

"That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:"

Those are the words of an individual attending the first congress of the forming United States (plural) of America while those assembled discussed (deliberated) on the idea of publishing a Declaration of Independence.

I can link that source too.

Having the above clearly (or not so clearly) mapped out, as a foundational step or two, utilizing the shielding aspect of the Ancient Law, which is the law of the land in America (or anywhere on earth where volunteers know the law) as eluded to in so many words called The Bill of Rights.

These words specifically:

"In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."

That is important because of the reference to a set of rules known as the common law. The common law is the Ancient Law. Those who will use fraud to enslave you are those who cannot allow their targets to know the facts that matter concerning the common law.

The point here is to first get past the barriers put in place between the victims of this overwhelmingly powerful fraud and the truth: the facts that matter in this case.

Which case?

What do you think this case ought to be called?

The People versus BLANK

Who is the prosecutor once we as a people reestablish our foundation?

Food for thought:

The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."

Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."