slug.com slug.com
42 15

Does it matter that George Floyd contributed to his tragic death?

Back before the Internet, there was a radio show by Paul Harvey called "The Rest of the Story" where they presented an event with little-known or forgotten facts held back until the end. The broadcasts always concluded with a variation on the tag line, "And now you know...the rest of the story." Once again, after polarizing violent protests, mitigating evidence comes out that gives a fuller picture of events.

Video at: [bluelivesmatter.blue]

In the Floyd case, new bodycam video become available that shows him agitated, resisting arrest, and saying "I can't breathe" all before ending up on the ground. While this does not fully exonerate the police officer, it does suggest that he was not exhibiting racist killer behavior at that time. Does this matter now that "Black Lives Matter" has fully leveraged the killing as "proof of police racism" to incite political and social protests?

Related: Do you see the tragic killing of Floyd George more an act of pure evil or pure incompetence?

What will you do now that you've seen this video?

  • 17 votes
  • 13 votes
  • 1 vote
  • 9 votes
  • 1 vote
  • 13 votes
Admin 8 Aug 4
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

42 comments (26 - 42)

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

No.

Now... the Left (and 'they' are anyone from Antifa to Soros to the Young Turks, etc.) were waiting for an opportunity. None of this was spontaneous beyond the first 2 days. Bringing the cop in on a murder charge would, in saner times, have ameliorated concerns about justice.

The Left were praying for an opportunity, a match to light in the time of Covid---40 million jobs lost. It was a golden moment for them and they've managed to play it well, regardless of what I think November will bring.

Having said all of that, you wouldn't put a dog down the way George Floyd was.


So, having watched the full video, here's an addendum.

Keith Ellison, if there's a Hell, has a room reserved. He hid the full video. Watching it, it becomes obvious that this death was as a result of escalation. What do I think the charge of the officer should be? I have no idea. But I do know what I saw at the END of the video. Shouldn't have happened.

Beyond which, it's fair to say that no matter how obvious something looks (and I have to say, when a guy is telling you he can't breathe before you put your knee on his neck, that's not a smart move) it's a imprudent to believe anything you see in "real time" outside of your proximate life.

In every day and every way, you are being played.

3

Can we have,( within the law ?) a way for Police to call in a " I have someone here on drugs", specialist, (the Dem's Social worker) to take over the subduing the Now, "patient"? Then the "patient would have a whole separate court of Doctors who would evaluate for three days, and before a three panel Judge Court, give their prognosis for the "patient" Judges on the Court. (Retired judges, with a-lot of experience in Criminal Courts?), who would decide to keep "patient" in a Drug/Jail/Clinic, or release to family, or return to the Criminal Justice system. Then use police for keeping the peace and the enforcing the laws? Not as Doctors with guns! Of Course, the taxes would go up for the extra non Police Drug assessment teams, and Courts. Might not need more police. The Druggy is Not going to like this!

The body cam footage from a social worker trying to deal with Gentle George would have been fun..

@tonkotsu It would indeed. I am only half serious, on my scenario. It is a patchwork of what I have heard these crazies imitating a politician, say they want, and the poor sods who are the Police. Would love to watch the Socialized medicine busybodies, deal with The wacko things drug addicted get up to. Maybe my scenario, would make a good TV comedy/drama? Definitely need a solution, after the wreck the spokes persons did for the Out of their mind, locked up citizens.

@Machiavelliwar oh, I’m with you. I think police need more funding for more training so that they can properly deal with things they determine call for different responses. That is, of course, another issue.. which would need more time, which means more money and more training. So yea, Marxists just yelling “defund the police!!!” isn't a plan, it’s just an empty platitude.

Not to mention, starting point of the Marxists is always the response of the police, instead of the shitty behavior of shitty people. There would be less of a need for an escalation of force in the first place if people were more responsible for their own behavior

2

Minnesota law - they might be able to charge assault if they can show intent to cause immediate bodily harm (his knee on his neck for prolonged period of time should suffice). Going for 2nd Degree (which is what they filed) is a stretch as follows:

  • 1-(1) - showing intent for murder does not match with the original behavior of the officers - calm, reholstered weapon, tried to restrain and place person in car for processing, called for medical support, etc...
  • 1-(2) - not a drive-by
  • 2-(1) - Officers were not engaged in felonious behavior
  • 2-(2) - No order for protection

We live in interesting times.

"Subd. 10.Assault. "Assault" is:
(1) an act done with intent to cause fear in another of immediate bodily harm or death; or
(2) the intentional infliction of or attempt to inflict bodily harm upon another."

"609.19 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE.
Subdivision 1.Intentional murder; drive-by shootings. Whoever does either of the following is guilty of murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being with intent to effect the death of that person or another, but without premeditation; or

(2) causes the death of a human being while committing or attempting to commit a drive-by shooting in violation of section 609.66, subdivision 1e, under circumstances other than those described in section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3).

Subd. 2.Unintentional murders. Whoever does either of the following is guilty of unintentional murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being, without intent to effect the death of any person, while committing or attempting to commit a felony offense other than criminal sexual conduct in the first or second degree with force or violence or a drive-by shooting; or

(2) causes the death of a human being without intent to effect the death of any person, while intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm upon the victim, when the perpetrator is restrained under an order for protection and the victim is a person designated to receive protection under the order. As used in this clause, "order for protection" includes an order for protection issued under chapter 518B; a harassment restraining order issued under section 609.748; a court order setting conditions of pretrial release or conditions of a criminal sentence or juvenile court disposition; a restraining order issued in a marriage dissolution action; and any order issued by a court of another state or of the United States that is similar to any of these orders."

1

I won't change anything. Ive never really worried about systemic racism because I don't see it as a real problem like it is portrayed as. Yes, racists exist in all walks of life but when u compare numbers of unarmed whites and blacks with the number of each group being in poverty it is easy to see it's not about racism at all and more about slave labor in for profit prisons. It's not the wealthy people getting killed and looking at poverty there is pretty much the same exact rate of cops shooting unarmed people no matter if they are white or black.

george Level 7 Aug 9, 2020
1

I think it's a red herring to take us off Joe Biden or some other scandal. They had this information at the onset. This is a diversion.

DLRR5 Level 3 Aug 6, 2020
1

That was hard to watch. He didn't seem altogether in the head. Although he wasn't being aggressive, he was definitely resisting. I'm confused as to why the officer pulled a gun on him when they got to the car, but I'm also confused as to why Floyd wasn't claustrophobic when he was in his own car. The officer isn't racist but it still doesn't excuse the fact that he knelt on someones neck for 8 minutes and waited till after he was unconscious to check on him. One instance of a negligent cop doesn't make all cops negligent, and negligence isn't racism.

Lilu Level 5 Aug 5, 2020
1

there is no way the kneeling on his neck killed him! it was everything else!

SOROS

1

Serious question - can anybody give me ONE example of a wrongful death at the hands of police in which the suspect cooperated and was killed?

RAZE Level 7 Aug 5, 2020

So what do you think of the death of Ethan Taylor a Downs Syndrome man who was killed by two OFF DUTY cops who took it upon themselves to restrain him when he didn't want to get up from his movie seat (he was only in it 5 minutes after the movie ended waiting for his mom). Two of them grabbed him and he ended up being strangled to death. They choked him to death.

[abcnews.go.com]

Since he said "no" were the two cops in the right to kill him for being uncooperative?

How much time would you and your friend in their shoes give this young man before you choked him out?

Botham Jean was just chilling at home watching TV when a cop busted into the wrong apartment and shot him to death because she thought it was her apartment.

Her apartment.

K.

Then there's Atiana Jefferson who was also in her home when cops spotted her through the window, playing video games and shot her because a neighbor said they heard strange noises.

Strange noises = right to shoot, yeh?

Oh and Charles Kinsey got shot because he was trying to help his ward that he was a legal caregiver of and the cops thought he was robbing someone and shot him. No questions asked.

Veteran Kenneth Chamberlain had his home invaded by police and when he asserted his rights by telling them he did not call them they tased and shot him. In his home.

7 year old Aiyana Jones of Detroit was set on fire by the flash grenades lobbed into her home. I suppose her parents being criminals justifies the cops not caring if a child was in the home. She didn't protest or try to resist arrest but was burnt to death anyway.

Do you want more or to start with these?

1

Yes. it puts things in perspective. the original video put the situation completely out of context!!!

1

Did anyone really expect otherwise? Lloyd was a criminal degenerate. Separation cannot come soon enough.

1

Both the officer and Floyd are tragic figures. Both are examples of our failure to inculturate the values of liberal democracy. Unless people develop the cultural values of a slow lifestyle they will have little long term success in a harsh but stable environment. It requires a great deal of delayed gratification and emotional control to successfully navigate a liberal democracy. What to do with people that get lost?

0

In order to be deemed "evil", I assume some sort of intent may be required? We don't know if it was evil because we were not there and most of us have never spoken to the officers involved. I am comfortable in stating it was INCOMPETENCE based on police training videos where a knee on the neck is considered a dangerous maneuver with strict protocols for its use. Many cops are calling the actions of the officers in this case to be questionable. Let's hope we get honest answers at the trial

0

Seems people will simply see what they want to in the video. There are too many microphones now days.

0

Trying to show to friends that it was not about racism and police brutality, that is wasn't a murder.

garvey Level 2 Aug 6, 2020
0

................................good day

RAZE Level 7 Aug 5, 2020
0

I’m PISSED that I lost an excellent job because of a meme about a fucking tweeker. Sorry for the language but I’m hot

It is a moral panic and people have lost their minds.

0

What exactly do you think he did that contributed to a death sentence?

The issue here is that the bloods report showed he OD on Fentanyl as the original ME’s report found.
The bodycam’s support this finding. He showed fentanyl OD symptoms before they even got to him.

There is a very high likelihood that he would have died without any external effects. In the US 20 000 die of very year due to Fentanyl overdose.

The cops are gonna walk on the homocide charge and need to be charged with aggravated assault, else they will walk... and we will see much worse riots.
Unless that is what you are hoping for...

@Hanno You're really something else.

@WilyRickWiles
Yes, I am a scientist who read the reports and looked up Fentanyl effects...
What part of my analyses is wrong?
He did not had fentanyl in his blood?
He did not show fentanyl OD symptoms?
20 000 people a year in the US did not die due to Fentanyl?
The LD50 for primates are 30 ng/kg.... he had 11. Anything above 10 is seen as potentially lethal, especially when combined with other factors...
Prince, Tom Petty and many others died the same way... it is well documented and well known.

The cops are guilty of aggravated assault and should be charged with that.

If this information was released early on we may have reduced the great harm that happened the following weeks.
Is that something bad?

@Hanno how do you figure "aggravated assault"? he was using a legitimate restraining tactic on an aggressive - and big, man.

@parsifal
The restraining technique has certain constraints on how it may be applied.
Applying it to someone who is unresponsive is outside those constraints. Doing it for 9 minutes without reprieve is outside those constraints
I should not say guilty... I should to say they need to be charged and let the courts run its course.

@Hanno you write 9 minutes is outside of those constraints...

Where does it say that? Is that part of any police training program?

@parsifal
I am not trained in the US as a police officer... So on that part I cannot say..

I however did train as a life guard in South Africa as a boy. We were taught more than 5 minutes without air causes irreversible brain damage.
I know US police are explained that this specific technique reduce oxygen to the brain... so I would want to assume that they are taught not to apply such a technique for more than 5 minutes without a change in hold that will allow the brain free flow of blood.
In any case... I cannot believe that 9 minutes is acceptable in any circumstance, especially if the perp is non-responsive after 5 minutes.
Someone higher up in the comments stated that he was specifically trained to allow blood flow every few minutes... so maybe question him.

I of course was not there... so a court will decide what was acceptable or not.

@Hanno Ah, ok. Well, I have. And the issue at hand is restricting air. This does not come close to compressing (literally crushing) a person’s windpipe.

The first I thought on seeing the video was positional asphyxia. A friend said a drug induced delirium.

Regardless, GF in the now released body cam video (finally) says while standing next to his car “I can’t breathe”.

And if one toxicologist reports 4-5 times the amount of fentanyl in his system than would kill you or I, my guess is death was not from being held down.

@parsifal
It is about adequate blood flow to the brain, not it air flow to lungs.
However I agree with you on the rest, as I did with my first posts.

@Hanno well, I don’t know what else “I can’t breathe” means. Lol.

@parsifal
That is the point I made right at the start. His death is likely caused by Fentanyl overdose and hence the homocide charge will not stick.
The next question is what the cops can be charged with.
And that is aggregated assault due to the prolonged use of restraining that was unnecessary.
Nothing to do with air flow etc, but the fact that kneeling on a persons neck is hazardous for them over time for reasons you mentioned... such as potential supine asphyxiation and reduced blood flow to brain.
To restrict an unresponsive person like that is unnecessary and hazardous. It becomes assault.
And now we see the end result. If he just got off him after 5 minutes, Floyd probably would still have died, however none of the chaos would have ensued.

@Hanno I didn’t say there was reduced flow of blood to the brain, but regardless...

Aggravated assault? Aggravated assault carries the intent to cause bodily harm with the use of a deadly weapon that could include a gun, a motorized vehicle, or another object like a bat. As a result, the person must have caused temporary or permanent injury. ... In Minnesota, assault becomes a felony when significant bodily harm occurs.

Problem one for the prosecution is proving intent.

Problem two is the autopsy results that indicated death from heart failure induced by drugs.

Problem three is reconciling the treatment of the other occupants of the vehicle and those of GF.

Problem four is there was no ongoing violence committed against GF, no assaults beyond a restraint approved by the police force.

While the court of public opinion might have already convicted the police, my guess is none of,the charges will stick.

@parsifal
Although I agree with you all above, you are playing into the hands of those who want to stop or reduce police powers.
I corrected my statement from that they are guilty to that they should charged and courts decide.

You cannot, not charge them.
I agree that my original suggestion of aggravated assault may be not the correct charge, however what the police officers did was not correct.

If you feel the arrest process was correct all the way through and they did nothing wrong, then you will begin to understand why the protests are happening.

Restraining an unresponsive person is simply not acceptable by modern day society. If this is “approved” police procedure, then the protesters have a point.

Again, I am not referring to the technique itself, I am referring to it’s excessive use on an unresponsive person.

@Hanno I only pointed out what I believe the difficulties with the charges are from my understanding of the case. It is nothing more than a political football and similar to other high profile cases, the people imo are merely pawns to other issues...

What personally have been waiting to see released are the videos from the body cams. One is finally out. The others? I believe they were held simply as part of the larger issues I referred to above.

Write Comment

Recent Visitors 189

Photos 127 More

Posted by Admin Does teaching "white guilt" also cultivate a "white pride" backlash?

Posted by Admin Is it time to take a knee on the Superbowl?

Posted by Admin Why not equality right now?

Posted by Admin How's Biden doing?

Posted by Admin How many good friends do you have from other political tribes?

Posted by Admin What did Trump do, if anything, to incite violence?

Posted by Admin Is free speech dead?

Posted by Admin Is free speech dead?

Posted by Admin Is free speech dead?

Posted by Admin Under what time and circumstance is the use of violence warranted?

Posted by Admin Now what?

Posted by Admin What do you expect to be achieved by this week's pro-Trump DC rally?

Posted by Admin What did you learn in 2020?

Posted by Admin Should pedophiles be allowed to have "child" sex robots?

Posted by Admin Do you have a "line in the sand" regarding political or social change?

Posted by Admin Should big tech firms hire more Blacks and Hispanics?

  • Top tags#video #media #racist #world #biden #truth #government #liberal #racism #democrats #conservatives #society #politics #community #youtube #justice #IDW #hope #friends #videos #Identity #FreeSpeech #Google #book #policy #vote #Police #conservative #evidence #culture #violence #reason #economic #USA #liberals #tech #Socialmedia #money #god #guns #gender #whites #campaign #population #laws #religion #TheTruth #equality #democrat #Christian ...

    Members 9,848Top

    Moderator