Critical Conspiracy Theory Facts III
by Joe Kelley
Critical Race Theory has gained currency as the slogan repeats in many forms of media passing from each individual to each individual in time and place.
Do the authors authorizing the dissemination of Critical Race Theory base the slogan on measurable facts that matter to anyone for any reason stated concisely or ambiguously, and if so are there any examples from any authors authorizing the dissemination of Critical Race Theory to help move the theory from theoretical form to a validated form?
Comparing, for example, Critical Race Theory to Conspiracy Theory in any form ambiguously or concisely, moving either Theory from theoretical form to validated form could help move either Critical Race Theory or Conspiracy Theory from theoretical form to validated form as each movement of each Theory can lead the way to move the other Theory from its theoretical form to each of its validated forms.
How does one validate a theory to make it more than JUST a theory?
An example would be a Conspiracy Theory involving the group known collectively as “The Founding Fathers” as those people were involved with Human Trafficking during their efforts to make The People as a whole pay the costs of maintaining the Human Trafficking markets between 1774 and 1781 when at least one woman took a Human Trafficker to court and won her case during a Massachusetts Civil Case in a Civil Court.
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
Please sir, please stop.
Conceived in Liberty, by Murray Rothbard
Slavery in Virginia
"The prevalent practice of fornication by the masters with the female slaves was regarded as “a pleasant method to secure slaves at a cheap rate.”
Human Traffickers, rapists, and other known criminals, known to conspire with each other, are also known to have problems with victims fighting back with words or defensive violence. The victims become angry and the victims form angry mobs of angry victims at times.
Rapists are known for having a problem with the word no, for example, one victim saying no is one thing, but a lot of victims saying no at the same time is a conspiracy theory.
In common with rapists are Treasonous Frauds.
George Mason, June 17, 1788:
“Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not strength, to the Union.”
Pleading with rapists, asking them to please move on to a more attractive victim, has perhaps a ray of hope in the eyes of the current victim being raped. A victim may attempt to throw the book at the rapist, using every possible tactical advantage within the power of the victim to defend against the active rapist actively shooting the rapist's gun.
Might it be useful to forensically uncover the truth about psychopaths being given a steady supply of defenseless and innocent victims? If telling them no does not work, what are the chances that pleading with them to move on to a better victim will work?
By the way, where is the law during all this human trafficking market activity?
The Covenant with Death and How It Was Made
By Paul Finkelman, 2000
“The abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison thought the U.S. Constitution was the result of a terrible bargain between freedom and slavery. Calling the Constitution a "covenant with death" and "an agreement with Hell," he refused to participate in American electoral politics because to do so meant supporting "the pro-slavery, war sanctioning Constitution of the United States." Instead, under the slogan "No Union with Slaveholders," the Garrisonians repeatedly argued for a dissolution of the Union.
“Part of Garrison's opposition to continuing the Union stemmed from a desire to avoid the corruption that came from participating in a government created by the proslavery Constitution. But this position was also at least theoretically pragmatic. The Garrisonians were convinced that the legal protection of slavery in the Constitution made political activity futile, while support for the Constitution merely strengthened the stranglehold slavery had on America. In 1845 Wendell Phillips pointed out that in the years since the adoption of the Constitution, Americans had witnessed "the slaves trebling in numbers—slaveholders monopolizing the offices and dictating the policy of the Government-prostituting the strength and influence of the Nation to the support of slavery here and elsewhere—trampling on the rights of the free States, and making the courts of the country their tools." Phillips argued that this experience proved "that it is impossible for free and slave States to unite on any terms, without all becoming partners in the guilt and responsible for the sin of slavery."
No, please sir, stop, please don't, stop, do not infringe upon my natural rights, please.
On the 20th day of October 1774
“This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted."
On the 1st of April, 1775
"On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited."
Some of THE SCIENCE is bogus, in any case, and some of THE FOUNDERS were criminal Treasonous Frauds in some cases.
Declaration of Independence
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another."
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
The 12 white men conspired to bribe the kidnap victim in 1781 in the Massachusetts Civil Case if I have my Conspiracy Theory moved a step closer to some form of validation. The kidnap victim took the bribe, perhaps, and was not obviously following up on any criminal charges to be moved from a Conspiracy Theory based upon Critical Race Theory to a County Criminal Trial by Jury Court Grand Jury for validation and then Trial by Jury where a defendant would face kidnapping charges or Human Trafficking charges soon after the 1781 Civil Case where the kidnap victim was bribed into taking the deal offered by the conspirators who conspired to bribe the kidnap victim in a criminal Human Trafficking case.
While some of THE SCIENCE may confirm or deny the Critical Race Theory THE FOUNDERS were clearly at odds as to their efforts to Monopolize the Human Trafficking markets then and now.
The U.S. Supreme Court's Failure to Fix Plea Bargaining: The Impact of Lafler and Frye
“Plea bargaining is deeply entrenched in the U.S. criminal justice system. Overall, ninety-four percent to ninety-seven percent of criminal cases are resolved by guilty pleas and not through trials.' Plea bargaining in the United States began in the late eighteenth century and became the "dominant means of resolving criminal cases" by the nineteenth century.'
“The criticism includes that plea bargaining fails to protect defendants' rights, is a form of torture, is overly coercive, leads defendants to "game" the system, fails to take victims into account, reinforces inequality (particularly towards ethnic minorities), leads to disparate sentencing, gives defendants better deals than they deserve, and undermines our system of justice due to its overuse at the expense of jury trials. Critics of plea bargaining express concern both about specific aspects of plea bargaining and about the system as a whole.”
The case moves from theory to trial date through independent County Criminal Court Grand Jury jurisdiction, where the defendant is supplied with the demand for trial by jury according to the law if the theory is validated by facts that matter as much as lives matter with or without color of law.