Stop the crap about Sydney Powell.

JacksonNought comments on Dec 2, 2020:

Tucker Fucking Carlson offered her as much un-edited time as she possibly could have wanted to present her evidence. She had nothing to present, and when he asked her, she threatened him and told him to stop contacting her. The Trumpists then turned around and tried to lump Carlson into Pizzagate ...

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@Lightman nope, burden of proof is on your side. Either show your evidence that Biden stole the election, or shut up.

Stop the crap about Sydney Powell.

JacksonNought comments on Dec 2, 2020:

Tucker Fucking Carlson offered her as much un-edited time as she possibly could have wanted to present her evidence. She had nothing to present, and when he asked her, she threatened him and told him to stop contacting her. The Trumpists then turned around and tried to lump Carlson into Pizzagate ...

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@MDonaldson you do know that in court, all evidence must be shared with each side before being presented? So the "other side" would see it anyway before the public. Also, if this is the argument, then what's to stop any ridiculous claim from being given equal weight? Let me go on mainstream media and claim, with no evidence provided, that Trump is working directly for Putin because of the infamous pee-tape blackmail. Remember when Trump claimed he had private investigators in Hawaii digging up "unbelievable things" about Obama, and he would be releasing this Earth-shattering evidence to prove Obama was not born in the USA? I'll remind you if you forget: https://remember45.com/claimed-he-sent-investigators-to-hawaii/ What ever happened with that? Nothing. Cohen even claimed he lied about it. So how is this any different? Trump is the most hyperbolic person possibly in history. Everything about him is "amazing" and "the best" and "the greatest". He has "perfect" phone calls. He has "the best people". He uses "the best words". He is the "most presidential" person in history. He is the "least racist" person in the room. He is the "healthiest" president in history. So forgive me if I don't believe this is "the greatest fraud we've ever seen".

Disputing Trump, Barr Says No Widespread Election Fraud

Krunoslav comments on Dec 2, 2020:

Bill Barr is so deep in the state its not even funny. Another corrupt traitor. His authority is not recognized. Neither is FBI.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@Krunoslav nothing but baseless accusations. Maybe if you had even a shred of proof.

Disputing Trump, Barr Says No Widespread Election Fraud

Krunoslav comments on Dec 2, 2020:

Bill Barr is so deep in the state its not even funny. Another corrupt traitor. His authority is not recognized. Neither is FBI.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@dmatic Osijek, Osjecko-Baranjska, Croatia

Disputing Trump, Barr Says No Widespread Election Fraud

Krunoslav comments on Dec 2, 2020:

Bill Barr is so deep in the state its not even funny. Another corrupt traitor. His authority is not recognized. Neither is FBI.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@dmatic make me.

Q This a response from Andrew Torba of GAB, to a request from Business Insider for comment for ...

JacksonNought comments on Dec 2, 2020:

That is truly laughable. Informed interpretation? A fixation on truth? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Claiming that any and all misspellings, slurred speech, and clearly bone-headed remarks are just coded messages is not truth-seeking, nor is claiming any incorrect ...

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@dmatic all snark, no substance.

Justice Department Investigating Possible Bribery-For-Pardon Scheme

Xtra comments on Dec 2, 2020:

A report by CNN with no names. Sounds like something Adam Schiff could work with.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@Xtra I don't work in government, and I don't have access to classified redacted information. However, what little has been shown is exponentially more evidence than anything floated by the "election fraud" wingnuts.

Q This a response from Andrew Torba of GAB, to a request from Business Insider for comment for ...

JacksonNought comments on Dec 2, 2020:

That is truly laughable. Informed interpretation? A fixation on truth? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Claiming that any and all misspellings, slurred speech, and clearly bone-headed remarks are just coded messages is not truth-seeking, nor is claiming any incorrect ...

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@Edgework seems I still need to when people keep believing this nonsense.

Justice Department Investigating Possible Bribery-For-Pardon Scheme

Xtra comments on Dec 2, 2020:

A report by CNN with no names. Sounds like something Adam Schiff could work with.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

@Xtra actually pointing you towards the evidence used, so you can't just scoff at CNN and dismiss it with your snark?

Justice Department Investigating Possible Bribery-For-Pardon Scheme

Xtra comments on Dec 2, 2020:

A report by CNN with no names. Sounds like something Adam Schiff could work with.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

You could actually look at the uscourts.gov documents yourself. But I am sure that must be "fake news" as well.

Justice Department Investigating Possible Bribery-For-Pardon Scheme

Krunoslav comments on Dec 2, 2020:

So the story was first reported by CNN which is a red flag and than Trump tweets its fake news. Between the two I think I'll trust Trump side.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

Of course, let's all trust Trump and his Twitter... the man who is currently retweeting **catturd2**.

Disputing Trump, Barr Says No Widespread Election Fraud

Krunoslav comments on Dec 2, 2020:

Bill Barr is so deep in the state its not even funny. Another corrupt traitor. His authority is not recognized. Neither is FBI.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

Like a good little puppet, you parrot the narrative. Who is the real "useful idiot" here? Of course you know all about the "Deep State" while not even being from here.

Disputing Trump, Barr Says No Widespread Election Fraud

bastion comments on Dec 2, 2020:

this lot will discount any and all reality - only trump is honest, everything else is lying. it's real 1984 stuff.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 2, 2020:

Very true!

Do you watch old TV shows and movies to "go back in time"?

JacksonNought comments on Dec 1, 2020:

Not all old movies could be made today, and that isn't necessarily a bad thing. We don't need to repeat embarrassments like Mickey Rooney in *Breakfast at Tiffany's* or the blackface crows in *Dumbo*. Others may not be seen as "woke" and could be considered "too white" but that wouldn't stop them...

JacksonNought replies on Dec 1, 2020:

@Admin to be honest I was never really a fan of any of the popular Hughes movies. I don't really enjoy rooting for characters who are truly assholes who are manipulative and abusive to the people around them, like Ferris Bueller. But regarding TBC, no character had any redeeming qualities. The supposed point of the movie is to challenge stereotypes, but at the same time it reinforces them. You had several delinquents causing trouble and terrorizing the principal, and we are supposed to take the kids' sides and assume the authority figure is the villain by default. You have Anthony Michael Hall, the suicidal teen who feels pressure over his workload, and at the end of the day all the other kids basically force him into doing their work. There was no lesson learned here. Judd Nelson's character basically emotionally abuses (an apparently at one point molests) Molly Ringwald until he breaks her will enough to sleep with him. This actually caused real-world issues on set, as he stayed in-character on set and tormented her, which was troubling since he was 25 and she was 16. Ally Sheedy was considered an outcast and unworthy of affection, until she gets a makeover and looks like the male's accepted definition of beauty. Only then does she earn Emilio Estevez's admiration, and the "prize" of dating him. They didn't break the stereotype of the jock here, having him fall for the outsider - they played into it by making the outsider change so it was acceptable for the jock to be with her. Part of the reason people liked the movie, and found it so revolutionary, is that it showed teenage characters who were multi-dimensional. But did it really? They were all essentially stereotypes. Just because they had issues with their parents didn't really change anything, it just added one more layer to their stereotype. And they had no real growth in the movie at all, just a whiplash-inducing shift in the last 5 minutes to make it seem like they were somehow different. Even the characters themselves acknowledged nothing probably changed, after detention everything would go back to the way it was.

USPS Whistleblower Richard Hopkins Gives New Interview Detailing Coercion Tactics Used By Fed ...

JacksonNought comments on Dec 1, 2020:

Yeah, but fuck the Ukraine call whistleblower, and fuck Lt. Col. Vindman for speaking out, right? They were clearly lying, and deserve to be retaliated against and dragged through the mud and have their lives ruined, right? But not this guy, since you agree with him, right? Is that how this works?

JacksonNought replies on Dec 1, 2020:

@Krunoslav typical of your side, you want your nice little undisturbed safe-space echo chamber. You can't stand conflicting opinions.

At the end of the interview, attorney Sidney Powell said: “It affects the bedrock of our ...

JacksonNought comments on Dec 1, 2020:

Repeating a lie over and over and over does not make it true. Come Jan 20 Biden will be our president (not yours, since you don't live in the USA, you are just a foreign agent trying to stir up shit and affect US politics). Trump will be kicked out and face criminal prosecution.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 1, 2020:

@dmatic I floated several scenarios where Trump and his team cheated, and asked you to prove they didn't. To show that you have no real argument, no real evidence, just the typical shifting of the burden of proof. Here's a new one. Prove you and Krunoslav aren't the same person, just posting on different accounts to pat yourself on the back and try and make your argument seem more legitimate. If you can't prove it, then I must be correct.

At the end of the interview, attorney Sidney Powell said: “It affects the bedrock of our ...

JacksonNought comments on Dec 1, 2020:

Repeating a lie over and over and over does not make it true. Come Jan 20 Biden will be our president (not yours, since you don't live in the USA, you are just a foreign agent trying to stir up shit and affect US politics). Trump will be kicked out and face criminal prosecution.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 1, 2020:

@dmatic, @Krunoslav, prove that Trump didn't cheat in 2016. Prove that Trump didn't try to cheat in 2020. If Biden cheated in 2020, prove that Trump didn't cheat as well - Biden was just better at it. See how that works?

At the end of the interview, attorney Sidney Powell said: “It affects the bedrock of our ...

JacksonNought comments on Dec 1, 2020:

Repeating a lie over and over and over does not make it true. Come Jan 20 Biden will be our president (not yours, since you don't live in the USA, you are just a foreign agent trying to stir up shit and affect US politics). Trump will be kicked out and face criminal prosecution.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 1, 2020:

@Krunoslav the burden of proof is on you. Prove that 73 million non dead people voted for Trump.

Hannity says trump should pardon himself and his whole family [huffingtonpost.

JacksonNought comments on Dec 1, 2020:

He can't pardon himself. Most likely he will resign with 1 day left so that Pence is acting president for 1 day to pardon him. Fortunately, the pardon only protects against federal crime. He will still be vulnerable to state prosecution.

JacksonNought replies on Dec 1, 2020:

@bastion his kids have definitely broken laws. Ivanka is guilty of tax fraud. Trump Jr met with the Russians for dirt on Hillary. They all ran a fraudulent charity. When Trump leaves office, he will have to deal with lawsuits concerning his organization committing tax fraud, insurance fraud, and falsifying financial records. He's facing lawsuits on over-valuing his assets. He'll be sued for violating the emoluments clause. He also has several defamation lawsuits in the wings.

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@Krunoslav am I supposed to know who Rachel Maddox is? Unless of course you mean Maddow? Is that supposed to be some cute name, or did you just mess up?

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@Krunoslav typical social media agitation by a foreign agent, spreading false narratives to try and foment discord in the USA.

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@Krunoslav once again, stick to Croatia and stay out of America.

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@73jazzbass uh huh, just ignore the point. Deflect deflect deflect.

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@Krunoslav no more foreign influence in American politics and elections. America First! Butt out.

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@Krunoslav https://www.npr.org/2019/09/01/737978684/what-you-need-to-know-about-foreign-interference-and-the-2020-election > Social media agitation continues by Russia and other foreign powers on big social network platforms; Facebook and Twitter, for example, have said since the 2016 election that they've continued purging bots and fake accounts linked to attempts to influence Americans.

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@Krunoslav that rich, coming from someone in Croatia.

Exactly! Don't you just love communist twitter censuring openly president of the United States while...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 28, 2020:

Go ahead, keep the lawsuits coming, keep trying to delay. If the result is still in question, Trump still has to leave on Jan 20. Get ready for President Pelosi while Trump clogs up the legal system with his whiny tantrum.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 28, 2020:

@Krunoslav cry more. All this love for the "America First" party who thinks you are the enemy for not being American. Why don't you follow their advice and butt out of American politics? Go back to your day-job at a computer bank making fake ads for Facebook. @73jazzbass you act like your statement negates the fact that Trump is throwing a whiny baby tantrum because he is such a narcissist that he can't accept defeat. The Wisconsin recount Trump so desperately wanted actually put Biden ahead by a wider margin. Deal with it. You'll make a good little fascist.

Trump Rambles on Speakerphone During Fake GOP Voter Fraud Hearing: A Closer Look

rightalign comments on Nov 27, 2020:

Evidence isn't enough when you have media censorship and corrupt state officials and judges.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 27, 2020:

@rightalign that's a false narrative. They were watched. There was even a live stream of it.

Trump Rambles on Speakerphone During Fake GOP Voter Fraud Hearing: A Closer Look

rightalign comments on Nov 27, 2020:

Evidence isn't enough when you have media censorship and corrupt state officials and judges.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 27, 2020:

If only there actually was evidence... that would be a start.

I listened to much of the testimony of the special committee on the recent Presidential election in ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 26, 2020:

Except there is absolutely zero evidence to back up their claims. Even when presenting in court, the lawyers have admitted they are not claiming fraud - as they'd be penalized for presenting false cases. Their whole argument is to try and find one or two ballots which are hard to verify, and then ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 27, 2020:

@Serg97 openly admit, not a chance. Trump, though, loves to rub it in faces that he can get away with clear treason and no one will do anything about it. Looking forward to his criminal prosecution when he leaves office.

Holy bastard child of Mary. Is this an ACTUAL free speech forum for people with real opinions?

angelo comments on Nov 27, 2020:

Hopefully it's not as biased to the left as is twitter and Facebook, to a certain degree so far as I can see.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 27, 2020:

"who are determined to stay for whatever reason..." I'm sorry, I didn't realize this was a site only for Conservatives. Are we encroaching on your safe space echo chamber?

Holy bastard child of Mary. Is this an ACTUAL free speech forum for people with real opinions?

Bay0Wulf comments on Nov 27, 2020:

Hopefully your opening sentence isn’t indicative of the way you actually tend to post. Being rude, crass and vulgar simply because you can, while tolerated, isn’t generally appreciated by most. Thankfully we all have a button that can completely block off such people from our sight if you ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 27, 2020:

Sorry, do you need a safe space?

Are you in your basement?

MikeHunt comments on Nov 27, 2020:

Yeah, he probably has a gallery. Donated his 1st wife and kids to Moloch, got the senate for almost 50 years,, donated old Beau, got the Presidency he always craved, I'd be laughing if it wasn't so obvious

JacksonNought replies on Nov 27, 2020:

Wow, that's a pretty vile thing to say about someone who lost his family in a tragic accident.

I listened to much of the testimony of the special committee on the recent Presidential election in ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 26, 2020:

Except there is absolutely zero evidence to back up their claims. Even when presenting in court, the lawyers have admitted they are not claiming fraud - as they'd be penalized for presenting false cases. Their whole argument is to try and find one or two ballots which are hard to verify, and then ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 27, 2020:

@Serg97 no, that was Trump. Trump openly admitted to treason.

I listened to much of the testimony of the special committee on the recent Presidential election in ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 26, 2020:

Except there is absolutely zero evidence to back up their claims. Even when presenting in court, the lawyers have admitted they are not claiming fraud - as they'd be penalized for presenting false cases. Their whole argument is to try and find one or two ballots which are hard to verify, and then ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 26, 2020:

@Serg97 nah, there's a difference between a literary (fictional) figure which represents ideals I look up to, and a real life evil man who sells the country out for a buck.

I listened to much of the testimony of the special committee on the recent Presidential election in ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 26, 2020:

Except there is absolutely zero evidence to back up their claims. Even when presenting in court, the lawyers have admitted they are not claiming fraud - as they'd be penalized for presenting false cases. Their whole argument is to try and find one or two ballots which are hard to verify, and then ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 26, 2020:

@Serg97 yeah the last four years have been pretty bad with the antichrist Trump.

I listened to much of the testimony of the special committee on the recent Presidential election in ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 26, 2020:

Except there is absolutely zero evidence to back up their claims. Even when presenting in court, the lawyers have admitted they are not claiming fraud - as they'd be penalized for presenting false cases. Their whole argument is to try and find one or two ballots which are hard to verify, and then ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 26, 2020:

@Hanno it's because Biden and the Dems aren't giant babies and sore losers. Biden even said he'd accept the results of he lost. Trump at least stuck to his word for the first time that he'd cry fraud if he didn't win.

I listened to much of the testimony of the special committee on the recent Presidential election in ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 26, 2020:

Except there is absolutely zero evidence to back up their claims. Even when presenting in court, the lawyers have admitted they are not claiming fraud - as they'd be penalized for presenting false cases. Their whole argument is to try and find one or two ballots which are hard to verify, and then ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 26, 2020:

@RidgeRunner, @Hanno probably because Trump's own DHS called this the most secure election in history, and Biden is not a sore loser baby who can't accept his results. But I think he should start a full investigation into every single Trump won to try and overturn them. If Trump can do it, Biden can too. We should also start full investigations into Kentucky and South Carolina, because it's possible McConnell and Graham won through fraud as well. Everything should be investigated, not just the presidency, but Congress as well.

I am having trouble understanding the American political system.

Angelboi comments on Nov 25, 2020:

Well...... treason is hard to really get arrested for with the Democrats supporting biden.... they would all have to be arrested for that... at at least the guy who voted for him in electoral college would... Then we wouldn't have an electoral college So yea... We can't do that, but we can ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 26, 2020:

Quite right. Trump admitted to treason on numerous occasions, with no consequences.

I am having trouble understanding the American political system.

TheMiddleWay comments on Nov 25, 2020:

There is no requirement to swear on the bible. Nothing Biden has said constitutes treason. The military is beholden to the country, not the man. Conservatives cry that the first and second amendments will be undone under liberals but it never has, nor will, happen. Take a nap. You're ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 26, 2020:

@Mechanic well I'm certainly glad people decided to write down rights for us to have, free of religious interpretation, otherwise we'd constantly be in a fight for whose idea of "creator rights" is correct. Not that we haven't had issues - it took us how long to end slavery, allow women to vote, and pass marriage equality?

We have a Constitution, why aren't we using it?

Malachite comments on Nov 25, 2020:

Because we've stopped teaching students what it says.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 26, 2020:

Too true, which is why you see a bunch of people cry "freedom of speech" when a social media platform bans them.

Lawyer Sidney Powell Says Trump Team Has “Massive” Evidence, Lawsuits Coming SOON | Glenn Beck...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 25, 2020:

Tucker Carlson said he offered her as much airtime as she wanted to present even a modicum of evidence, to which she got upset that he expected any facts from her, so she yelled at him to leave her alone. TruNews then attacked Carlson, claiming he was a pedophile involved in Pizzagate. I'd ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 25, 2020:

Typical. You must flock to fringe sources like InfoWars, Glenn Beck, and TruNews - places which would spit on you for being a foreigner, and encourage the US to nuke you to oblivion.

I am having trouble understanding the American political system.

lawrenceblair comments on Nov 25, 2020:

The people have sold there birthright for a bowl of soup.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 25, 2020:

@lawrenceblair it was rhetorical question. He does want to get rid of it. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-considering-order-to-target-birthright-citizenship-in-last-weeks-2020-11 Sounds like he is selling it for everyone just so he can have soup.

I am having trouble understanding the American political system.

TheMiddleWay comments on Nov 25, 2020:

There is no requirement to swear on the bible. Nothing Biden has said constitutes treason. The military is beholden to the country, not the man. Conservatives cry that the first and second amendments will be undone under liberals but it never has, nor will, happen. Take a nap. You're ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 25, 2020:

@dbetzel the Bill of Rights doesn't give absolute freedom. A tax doesn't violate the 2nd Amendment, just like threats and slander aren't protected by the 1st Amendment. There are still laws dictating what level of weapon someone can own (rifle, handgun, full auto, grenade, etc) as well as laws around transportation and possession and sales. A $200 tax is nothing.

I am having trouble understanding the American political system.

lawrenceblair comments on Nov 25, 2020:

The people have sold there birthright for a bowl of soup.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 25, 2020:

Isn't Trump the one who wants to remove birthright citizenship?

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 20, 2020:

@Serg97 nope, never murdered anyone, nor have I wanted to.

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 20, 2020:

@Serg97 then it wouldn't really be my position, now would it? Seems obvious to me your position is you want to murder.

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Serg97 and what, pray tell, is my position?

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@GaryWitt uh huh. Excuse me if I don't see the humor, especially when I know your side would flip shit if a liberal was joking about violence against a conservative.

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@GaryWitt joking about murdering Harris?

Where do these psychopaths live.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 19, 2020:

What exactly does your first statement mean? Are you advocating murder?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Krunoslav you advocate for finding where people live so you can take care of them. You want to murder people you disagree with because of some conspiracy theory. You, an Eastern European, want to kill Americans.

Where do these psychopaths live.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 19, 2020:

What exactly does your first statement mean? Are you advocating murder?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Krunoslav ok, so you're recommending murder. Got it.

Where do these psychopaths live.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 19, 2020:

What exactly does your first statement mean? Are you advocating murder?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Krunoslav then what does this mean: > Where do these psychopaths live. someone doxx them so we can defend against these psychopaths.

Hot Mic Open on Trump's Official YouTube Stream

MDonaldson comments on Nov 19, 2020:

So... his hair dye ran, eh Jack***..slow news day I guess...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

Wow you're the epitome of wit.

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Serg97 keep moving them goalposts.

Where do these psychopaths live.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 19, 2020:

What exactly does your first statement mean? Are you advocating murder?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Krunoslav so to be clear, your are advocating for murder?

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Serg97 you specifically said "you and YOUR side" meaning me as well. So you did say me. Also I've condemned violence during the protests tons of times on this site. Are you going to condemn a call for violence from the OP?

Where do these psychopaths live.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 19, 2020:

What exactly does your first statement mean? Are you advocating murder?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Krunoslav or maybe you're stuck in an echo chamber of lunatic fear mongering. No one you are accusing is a "self confessed communist" and no one wants mass murder or famine. You are being corrupted by opportunists. Open your eyes and let go of your hate, you'll find life much more enjoyable.

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Serg97 when have I ever advocated murder? I have condemned violence many times. I'm not the one encouraging a congressman to stab a VP candidate.

cope and change

angelo comments on Nov 19, 2020:

Being relieved Trump lost is a mistake in itself right there! Don't people realise that the replacement is an open pedophile with a commo VP?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

Open pedo you say...

Inreally want to know when the mandates/guidelines will be enough for those who actually think they ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

Just curious on your thoughts. How is this different than other government mandates / guidelines? The government already tells use what we have to wear. In many states women are not allowed to go topless, or they can be fined for not wearing the right kind of bikini bottom on beaches. Stores have...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 19, 2020:

@Joehlert11 sexual is only in how someone perceives it. Why are men allowed to go topless, but not women? Can't people find topless men sexual? In Muslim-run countries, women have to wear burkas because the mere sight of a woman is too sexual and impure - is that how we want to handle ourselves? Remember when women showing their ankles was scandalous? Yes, you have to toe the line and figure out where your rights end and another's begins. So you are saying going topless infringes on someone else's rights because they have to be exposed to it? But you don't think the same applies to spreading a disease to someone? You may dismiss it as not serious enough, but we have seen over 250k Americans die over the past 8 months. You don't know how someone will react when catching it, whether they have immunodeficiencies or underlying conditions which will make it much worse for them. The main point of the mask is to protect others from spreading it, and by not wearing one or not social distancing, you are putting others at risk and exposing them without their consent. Someone could be making a much-needed trip to the grocery store, taking all precaution, but you decided to attend a packed gathering the day before and now are carelessly walking through the store without following safety guidelines, and spread the virus to them and they end up dying. But you did it because of your "freedoms" - how is that any different than going topless for freedom and someone sees it who chose not to? Typically being careless are resulting in someone's death can result in involuntary / voluntary manslaughter charges. We've seen people actually charged for spitting on people during the pandemic. We just can't apply this consistently because we can't trace who is spreading. The science seems pretty clear on masks, actually. The medical grade ones are more for protecting the wearer, the other masks (when worn properly) protect others. They are based on the science that we continually evolve on with new information - as science operates - which is why masks weren't originally required. And yes, we already let the government regulate everything else. As I already said, we let them define who we marry and what someone can do with their own body (drugs, prostitution, etc). After 9/11 we let the government get away with invasion and murder to circumventing due process because it made people feel safe from their Islamic paranoia. We let the government enforce arbitrary hurdles based on religious propaganda on perfectly legal procedures, like mandatory waiting periods and forced ultrasounds for abortions. The same people who protests wearing a thin piece of cloth on their face are usually the ones who think it is okay to run over protesters for walking in the street or think it is ...

Sen.

GaryWitt comments on Nov 18, 2020:

OK, the fist bump could have been a lot harder, and the pat on the back could have been accompanied by cutlery. But hey, Lindsay is old school.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

Real nice. Advocating for violence / murder.

Inreally want to know when the mandates/guidelines will be enough for those who actually think they ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

Just curious on your thoughts. How is this different than other government mandates / guidelines? The government already tells use what we have to wear. In many states women are not allowed to go topless, or they can be fined for not wearing the right kind of bikini bottom on beaches. Stores have...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@73jazzbass not true. I want smart regulations on a temporary basis using the best science available to help stop the spread of a deadly virus, more specifically a virus which can affect and potentially disable / kill a non-consenting party. If only the person acting foolishly could be affected, I'd have no problems. I think telling people they can't do drugs is wrong, but I have no problem telling people they can't drive under the influence.

[youtu.be] "WHY DO YOU CENSOR US?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

Free Speech applies to government action, not the terms set by a private company which offers a no-cost platform. You have a right to free speech, but not the right to an audience.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@parsifal, @Jrockintx83 they are not a publisher for choosing what content is allowed. They are not creating or curating content, it is still user generated. Section 230 protection means they cannot be held liable for user content - if someone makes a post encouraging violence on someone, and then someone actually goes through with it, Twitter cannot be sued for letting that happen. That does not mean they can't set their own TOS and rules for who can have an account and post. I will once more bring up sex workers. Can we start holding hearings on platforms like Facebook and YouTube because they don't allow nudity or sexual content? That is a total infringement on free speech and censoring people, right? It should be a free-for-all of anything people want to post? If you want to take away Section 230 protection, then you are welcoming mass bannings of people for the platforms to protect themselves, probably Trump as the very first one. Parler is making its users agree to a clause to pay for legal bills if they are sued for content - would you prefer Twitter do this? Maybe they should, so some random troll in his basement will be forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars in legal feels for deciding to post that Hillary Clinton eats babies.

Sooooo, Could this be true, did they really have a raid in Germany after all?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

No, it is not true. You really think CA went red?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@Geofrank because red states typically have terrible fiscal environments, right? West Virginia and Oklahoma, which went 100% red this election (not a single blue county, sounds fishy) are in the top 3 of most welfare recipients.

[youtu.be] "WHY DO YOU CENSOR US?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

Free Speech applies to government action, not the terms set by a private company which offers a no-cost platform. You have a right to free speech, but not the right to an audience.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@Afterthought but again, Facebook and Twitter are not civil rights. You do not have a "right" to be given a platform to reach millions upon millions of people to share your opinions. I will use the nudity example again - Facebook bans nudity or sexual content. A sex worker cannot use Facebook to promote the sale of their nude photos. This is no different than telling someone they cannot use Facebook to spread misinformation about Election results or pandemic issues. Facebook and Twitter are privately companies which can set their rules how they see fit, and you do not have a right demand they let you promote yourself. I absolutely agree with you that blacklisting or "cancelling" is wrong, and people should not be banned from using banks or travel or other public utilities because of their backwards thinking. You can make the argument that if one bank or travel company bans them, then they can just go to another one - but what if they all ban? That can be problematic. I feel the same way about the whole bakery / florist vs same-sex couple debate, as there is no guarantee the couple could find a different place to accommodate them.

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

As a Jew, it is not concerning. Jews are not some monolith. You can have liberal Jews in politics like Bernie Sanders and conservative Jews in politics like Stephen Miller. You can have liberal Jewish pundits like Sam Seder and conservative Jewish pundits like Ben Shapiro. You can have atheist Jews,...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@Corjova I can think whatever I want about Christianity, as a man, as a Jew, as an atheist - I don't have to conform to groupthink. Why would I give a shit about the Talmud, a religious document only followed by the most extreme Orthodox and Conservative Judaism sects? You can read whatever you want. Writers can cite whatever they want. But that doesn't legitimize anything. I'd actually say you delegitimize yourself if you use Hitler's paranoid ramblings as evidence. Why do *you* lie about indigenous populations in America pre-Christian occupation? There were millions of native people living in America, and no - Columbus and other Christian settlers did not treat them "gently". There was murder, rape, enslavement... even after America was more establish, the native populations were still treated abhorrently. Ever hear of the Trail of Tears? Christians in the USA did not leave people in peace. In fact, the Salem Witch Trials mostly started because of prejudice towards Native Americans. I already acknowledged that religiously, Judaism is not innocent when it comes to slavery or other atrocities. After all, the Old Testament is the Jewish book. But I am willing to condemn the religion of Judaism, on the same level of the religion of Christianity. You are removing religion from the conversation and attacking Jews based on lineage and ethnicity. Again, you are the liar here. Christian dogma is 100% forced on non-believers. We have fortunately made great strides in the past 300 years to become a more secular and pluralist nation, with Christian influence being less legally mandated, but that doesn't stop them from still trying. If you idolize the first American Christian settlers so much, you should encourage school districts no longer celebrating Christmas - the Puritans banned it.

[youtu.be] "WHY DO YOU CENSOR US?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

Free Speech applies to government action, not the terms set by a private company which offers a no-cost platform. You have a right to free speech, but not the right to an audience.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@Afterthought yeah, human behavior is pretty dark and evil throughout history. Which is why private companies are not obligated to give you a platform to spew dark and evil rhetoric.

Sooooo, Could this be true, did they really have a raid in Germany after all?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

No, it is not true. You really think CA went red?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@FEWI still not possible in CA. There are more Democratic legal voters than Republican.

[youtu.be] "WHY DO YOU CENSOR US?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 18, 2020:

Free Speech applies to government action, not the terms set by a private company which offers a no-cost platform. You have a right to free speech, but not the right to an audience.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@parsifal they aren't censoring anyone's free speech. They are not obligated to give them a platform to speak. Facebook has rules against nudity - is it censoring people's free speech by not allowing nudity?

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

As a Jew, it is not concerning. Jews are not some monolith. You can have liberal Jews in politics like Bernie Sanders and conservative Jews in politics like Stephen Miller. You can have liberal Jewish pundits like Sam Seder and conservative Jewish pundits like Ben Shapiro. You can have atheist Jews,...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 18, 2020:

@Corjova so you base you opinion on Jews not from knowing Jews, and acknowledging they are not a monolith, and seeing them as an ethnicity no different than Germans or Italians... but on three books you own. Lovely. And you just happen to own several books on how Jews are evil. Yeah, you seem like a swell guy. Not a Nazi sympathizer or anything. I guess I should base all of my opinions on Christians based on books... let's see, how about *God Is Not Great* by Hitchens, or *Reflections on the Evils of Christianity* by Darien, or *The God Delusion* by Dawkins. I am not going to get into a debate about MacDonald's theories yet again. It is like trying to have an actual debate with someone who believes in Flat Earth, or Lizard People, or QAnon... there is just no logic there. Nathan Cofnas has already completely destroyed MacDonald's argument in various rebuttals, saying he "misuses sources, applies his theory differently to Jews and non-Jews, and chooses a complicated explanation for Jewish history when simpler ones would suffice." You might as well quote *Mein Kampf*... which, by the way, the person I previously mentioned who always quoted MacDonald also quoted MK as well. Again, great company to keep. You do realize the USA was already home to people. The the Christians came in and slaughtered and enslaved them all, forcing their ways on them. Yeah, I consider that a virus cult destroying a host country and wiping away all previous traces in favor of their own. Just like the Crusades. You also know the whole "Christian settlers... for free Christians who are allowed to worship God in any way they see fit" thing is not true, right? The Christians / Puritans left England because it wasn't *their* flavor of Christianity, and they wanted a theocracy of their own, where they imposed their extremely narrow and strict practice on the colonies. Look at the Salem Witch Trials. They banned Christmas. Only church members could vote or hold office. Any question against the church was a crime and resulted in imprisonment. Just look at the stockades, and scarlet letters. "Christian do not enslave people" wow, that is one of the most ridiculous things you have said so far. First, American slave-holders used the Bible to justify slavery, commonly quoting *Genesis IX, 18–27* and *Ephesians VI, 5-7*. No slavery in Europe? Again, ever hear of the Crusades? Church law endorsed slavery as an "instrument for Christian conversion" where Christians were protected from slavery, but Muslims and non-Christian pagans were acceptable to enslave. European Christians initially saw non-Christians as "natural slaves". After the expansion into the new world, Christians started to change from non-Christian slaves to non-European slaves, and set their sights on Africa. They ...

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

MDonaldson comments on Nov 16, 2020:

My vote wasn't about concern, but confusion. It would appear that the donations are against their own interests. Democrats are solidly behind BDS. Dems were the loudest voices of outrage against Trump's relocation of the US embassy to Jerusalem.. even though just about every president for decades ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

American Jews =/= Israel. Simple as that.

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

As a Jew, it is not concerning. Jews are not some monolith. You can have liberal Jews in politics like Bernie Sanders and conservative Jews in politics like Stephen Miller. You can have liberal Jewish pundits like Sam Seder and conservative Jewish pundits like Ben Shapiro. You can have atheist Jews,...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@Corjova oh great, another person quoting MacDonald. You aren't the first on this site, and I doubt you'll be the last. Just so you know the company you are joining, there was a poster a couple months ago who would go around quoting MacDonald constantly - it was his entire argument for everything, basically that Jews were evil and to blame for all of the world's issues. He even had his own group about how Jews were ruining the planet. In a conversation I had with him, he essentially claimed that Catholic priests raping children wasn't a big deal - it was excusable - because they weren't Jews. So that is all I can see when someone uses MacDonald to try and rationalize their position: that any ills of mankind is excusable except for Jewishness. Ok, Christians aren't an ethnic group... they are more like a cult, going into their host countries and trying to convert everyone into their way of thinking or else they slaughter and enslave them. Christmas and Easter are just stolen Pagan holidays. Look at missionaries going to Africa to try and convert poverty-stricken nations, but make sure they know that condoms aren't allowed so AIDS can live on. How about US Christian missionaries going to Uganda and helping them create a "Kill The Gays" law? If we are talking about ethnicity, how about the typical Italian / Irish Catholic? Couldn't they be considered as having allegiance to a foreign power - The Vatican and The Pope - and therefore cannot be trusted in America? How about The Federalist Society, which helped groom and install the last several Republican appointed Supreme Court justices... which I have already said, 7 of 9 are Catholic. Seems to me they are trying to take over, even when they are only 20% of the US population. Let's not forget, as I previously stated, they raped children and covered it up... seems like they are protecting their own self interests, everyone else be damned. They also believe in literal cannibalism through the eucharist... talk about a blood libel. You want to talk about lobbying organizations? How about the Family Council, a fundamentalist Christian organization which influences US law. Did you know that a 3rd of federal public sexual education funding goes towards Christian "Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage" programs? This is taxpayer money, going to public schools with non-Christian students, enacting Christian dogma into their education. They teach factually inaccurate claims like "condoms cause cancer" and stress that abstinence is the only topic on the curriculum. Just last year, the Family Council helped defeat a bill in Arkansas which would have mandated for proper STI and pregnancy prevention requirements in sex-ed. Despite the Christian's absolute hate for abortion, and comprehensive sex-ed being proven to reduce ...

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

As a Jew, it is not concerning. Jews are not some monolith. You can have liberal Jews in politics like Bernie Sanders and conservative Jews in politics like Stephen Miller. You can have liberal Jewish pundits like Sam Seder and conservative Jewish pundits like Ben Shapiro. You can have atheist Jews,...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@Admin most Jews in the US are secular / liberal Jews. They tend to skew Democratic because the Republican party often appears to be the party of white supremacists and anti-Semites, regardless if that is really true or not. Why would Jews vote for a party whose goal is their subjugation / elimination?

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

Truth_Teller20 comments on Nov 17, 2020:

Jewish people are victims of nothing. Let's move past pretending they have special victimhood status and judge Jews on their actions and inborn attributes.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@parsifal as long as there are people that still want Jews dead merely because they are Jews (or people, such as on this site, who perpetuate the blood libel myth) then yeah, they sort of are a hated minority.

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

Corjova comments on Nov 17, 2020:

It is impossible to mention, discuss or even hint at Jewish influence while being a "goy", sometimes even while being a former Jew, without being called antisemitic. or at least dangerous to Jewish interests. I try not to be intimidated by this and speak openly about Jews and their ways. As a ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@parsifal blood libel is made up. That's all you need to know. No further comment necessary.

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

Corjova comments on Nov 17, 2020:

It is impossible to mention, discuss or even hint at Jewish influence while being a "goy", sometimes even while being a former Jew, without being called antisemitic. or at least dangerous to Jewish interests. I try not to be intimidated by this and speak openly about Jews and their ways. As a ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@parsifal correct. It is a myth. No such thing.

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

FrozenSoul comments on Nov 17, 2020:

The Jews (most) are the most racist people on the planet and this is why it matters: SATANIC VERSES OF THE TALMUD'S "JEWISH SUPREMACY" * "If a `goy' (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed." (Sanhedrin 58b) *"If a Jew finds an object lost by a `goy' it does not have to be returned." (Baba Mezia...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@Corjova, @CelticRing so what that sounds like to me is you should throw away the entirety of the Old Testament, as it is no longer relevant and God no longer recognizes it as valid. God admitted to changing his mind and erring. He has mood swings and is not perfect.

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

As a Jew, it is not concerning. Jews are not some monolith. You can have liberal Jews in politics like Bernie Sanders and conservative Jews in politics like Stephen Miller. You can have liberal Jewish pundits like Sam Seder and conservative Jewish pundits like Ben Shapiro. You can have atheist Jews,...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@Corjova yes, you can 100% apply the logic equally to all self-identifying groups. They typically all have shared commonalities, self-interest for their in-group, and goals to achieve. It is a typical anti-Semitic nonsensical talking point to claim that somehow Jews are unique or "different" in how they care about group interests - something I have seen echoed on this site primarily by those who openly celebrated Hitler and suggested I should be enslaved or killed because of my ethnicity. Please, do explain specifically how Christians aren't the same. Christians make their faith their primary purpose, trying to inject it into politics and heavily backing corrupt and quite un-Christian politicians (like Trump) in order to attain their goals of Christian-dominance in the Supreme Court to try and demolish abortion rights and allow for discrimination against people with different sexual orientation or gender identity. Where I live, a local politician running for Congress had lawn signs with "God" as the very first part of her platform, before Country, or Jobs, or Security - that is echoed by many Christians, who put their god and the Bible above the Constitution. Look at how Christians came out in support of slavery, because the Bible condoned it. Look at how Christians came out in support of anti-miscegenation laws, saying their religion was against race-mixing. Look at how Christians came out against marriage equality, with DOMA and the LDS church heavily campaigning against California's Prop 8. You don't see this as catering specifically to Christian in-group interests at the detriment to out-groups? Please. It's highly insulting, and quite laughable, to assume you know more than I do about my own though patterns. When I say "as a Jew" I am letting you know that I can speak to the whole "monolith" myth, and show you that not all Jews are the same. Especially when I am highly critical of Israel, and have no allegiance to them. As I always say, feel free to criticize Israel all you want, you'll receive no backlash from me, as long as you aren't denying their right to exist. Same with Judaism in practice - I am highly critical of the religion, as I am non-practicing. Go ahead and criticize the religion all you want, as long as you aren't suggesting they are subhuman or don't deserve the same freedoms as Christians. Saying "as a Jew" is no different than saying "as a woman" or "as a Christian" or "as an African-American" - it is acknowledging a part of yourself, whether that is ethnicity or heritage or religion, and giving your perspective based on how that part has shaped your life. Saying "as a Jew" doesn't mean you are "whining" about suffering. Does saying "as a Christian" automatically mean you are whining about not being allowed to kill gays? Are...

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

Corjova comments on Nov 17, 2020:

It is impossible to mention, discuss or even hint at Jewish influence while being a "goy", sometimes even while being a former Jew, without being called antisemitic. or at least dangerous to Jewish interests. I try not to be intimidated by this and speak openly about Jews and their ways. As a ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@parsifal there is no such thing, it is nothing but anti-Semitic fear-mongering, much like today's Satanic Panic with QAnon.

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

FrozenSoul comments on Nov 17, 2020:

The Jews (most) are the most racist people on the planet and this is why it matters: SATANIC VERSES OF THE TALMUD'S "JEWISH SUPREMACY" * "If a `goy' (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed." (Sanhedrin 58b) *"If a Jew finds an object lost by a `goy' it does not have to be returned." (Baba Mezia...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@CelticRing so Christians admit that God made a mistake in the OT and needed to change the rules?

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

FrozenSoul comments on Nov 17, 2020:

The Jews (most) are the most racist people on the planet and this is why it matters: SATANIC VERSES OF THE TALMUD'S "JEWISH SUPREMACY" * "If a `goy' (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed." (Sanhedrin 58b) *"If a Jew finds an object lost by a `goy' it does not have to be returned." (Baba Mezia...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

Orthodox and Conservative Judaism are the only ones who see the Talmud as authoritative... hmm, the ones who support Trump by and large. Imagine that. You want to compare with the abhorrent contents of the Christian Bible? Which condones human sacrifice, slavery, rape, incest, murder, etc?

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

Truth_Teller20 comments on Nov 17, 2020:

Jewish people are victims of nothing. Let's move past pretending they have special victimhood status and judge Jews on their actions and inborn attributes.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

You had me in agreement until "inborn attributes"... what exactly does that mean?

Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

As a Jew, it is not concerning. Jews are not some monolith. You can have liberal Jews in politics like Bernie Sanders and conservative Jews in politics like Stephen Miller. You can have liberal Jewish pundits like Sam Seder and conservative Jewish pundits like Ben Shapiro. You can have atheist Jews,...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 17, 2020:

@Corjova what exactly is "behaving like a Jew"? As I already said, Jews are not a monolith. Look at the vast difference between Jews like Sam Seder and David Pakman vs Ben Shapiro and Dennis Prager. Or if we are talking government, look at the vast difference between Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer vs Jared Kushner and Stephen Miller. Apply you logic to literally any other group. As a non-Christian, I would prefer Christians to behave more like non-Christians. Alas, Christians tend to behave and act as Christians and are catering to their own perceived group interests, which they happen to interpret in strong ingroup-outgroup patterns. Every time a Christian claims to speak "as a Christian" I translate the claim into "as an enemy of non-Christians". As an atheist, I'd prefer theists to behave more like atheists. Ever time I hear someone say "as a proud god-fearing person..." or claiming to "put god above all else" I translate the claim to "as an enemy of atheists". Look at how Evangelicals are Trump's most vocal supporters, and were one of the main reasons he won in 2016. They supported the most corrupt, un-Christian president in history, because they saw it as a means to an end in advancing their interests. How is this any different than your claims about Jews?

"No president in history has been more vilified or was more vilivied during the time he was ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

Sorry, but Trump created "birtherism" which made Obama more vilified than Trump.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 16, 2020:

@Krunoslav you seem to care about Trump the person enough that you echo his talking points constantly, and seem to be extremely invested in his platform and the day-to-day politics of America. With constant accusations of foreign attempts to influence our election and politics, from both Reps and Dems, it still seems interesting to me that someone from Eastern Europe is so heavily invested in our politics. I barely, if ever, watch CNN - so you missed the mark on that one. I wonder what media you consume? Fox News... no, that might be *too* moderate for you. Probably Info Wars? OAN? TruNews? As I have said before, the real TDS is exhibited by those who refuse to acknowledge anything remotely negative about the man, and will twist themselves into knots to defend the most abhorrent actions. I am not a Communist, nor is Joe Biden or the majority of the Democratic party or Progressives. You need to find a different bogeyman. I find it interesting that no matter what corruption and disgusting behavior and white supremacy and theocratic/autocratic ideology is revealed about your righty friends, you have zero capacity to understand it's wrong or the danger it poses and your typical response is, but the other guy is worse or some petty response. Truly a lost soul. No capacity or understanding of ethical behavior and why it matters. None. Quite pathetic actually. I wonder if you would think the same if you spend some time in the Concentration Camps or border cages or lost family to right-wing terrorism or racist / homophobic / transphobic hate crimes or police brutality. But you would not know much about that, would you? Much like majority of RWNJs you seem to be a miserable individual and can't stand that others are not as miserable as yourself, completely blinded to the corruption and dangers of it, no matter the side of politics. You see, unlike you, I'm not a tribal. If Biden was what lying conservative media and morons say, I would be very critical of him, because I'm also not insane to support rightwing theocratic scum. Which I suppose you belong to the "useful idiots" tribe.

"No president in history has been more vilified or was more vilivied during the time he was ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 16, 2020:

Sorry, but Trump created "birtherism" which made Obama more vilified than Trump.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 16, 2020:

@Krunoslav I could say the same for you. Especially when you live in Croatia, yet you worship Trump, a nationalist whose policy is "America First" and who doesn't give a fuck about you.

Democrats are so rabidly against about a recount and an investigation into irregularities a person ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 14, 2020:

Is that why Trump supporters were against counting all the votes where Trump was leading, but for continuing counting where he was behind?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 14, 2020:

@parsifal you mean when the GOP legislatures finally let people start counting the mail-ins?

Oh, stop it! What would this guy know about elections? [djhjmedia.com]

JacksonNought comments on Nov 13, 2020:

You mean Trump lackey Trey Trainor? Whose role in the FEC is to regulate campaign finance rules and not weigh in on voting? Who in September called the separation of church and state a "fallacy" and claimed we were in a "spiritual war" and that Catholic Churches should violate federal law to endorse...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 14, 2020:

@parsifal can you name one Democrat who meets yours? I voted for W in 2000. There is no evidence to suggest Biden would be going to jail. I can't see them the same for your hero Trump. There's also no evidence that Biden is senile or on his last legs... I think he can easily walk down a ramp.

Oh, stop it! What would this guy know about elections? [djhjmedia.com]

JacksonNought comments on Nov 13, 2020:

You mean Trump lackey Trey Trainor? Whose role in the FEC is to regulate campaign finance rules and not weigh in on voting? Who in September called the separation of church and state a "fallacy" and claimed we were in a "spiritual war" and that Catholic Churches should violate federal law to endorse...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 14, 2020:

@parsifal when did I ever say that? I just think very little of Trainor. And Lightman. You're also free to leave the country if you don't want Biden as your president.

Oh, stop it! What would this guy know about elections? [djhjmedia.com]

JacksonNought comments on Nov 13, 2020:

You mean Trump lackey Trey Trainor? Whose role in the FEC is to regulate campaign finance rules and not weigh in on voting? Who in September called the separation of church and state a "fallacy" and claimed we were in a "spiritual war" and that Catholic Churches should violate federal law to endorse...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 13, 2020:

@Lightman I didn't ask you.

Oh, stop it! What would this guy know about elections? [djhjmedia.com]

JacksonNought comments on Nov 13, 2020:

You mean Trump lackey Trey Trainor? Whose role in the FEC is to regulate campaign finance rules and not weigh in on voting? Who in September called the separation of church and state a "fallacy" and claimed we were in a "spiritual war" and that Catholic Churches should violate federal law to endorse...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 13, 2020:

@parsifal so you are perfectly okay with Trump and his packed SCOTUS just handing him the election in an authoritarian move?

Oh, stop it! What would this guy know about elections? [djhjmedia.com]

JacksonNought comments on Nov 13, 2020:

You mean Trump lackey Trey Trainor? Whose role in the FEC is to regulate campaign finance rules and not weigh in on voting? Who in September called the separation of church and state a "fallacy" and claimed we were in a "spiritual war" and that Catholic Churches should violate federal law to endorse...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 13, 2020:

@parsifal more accurate than Incestuous Don.

Which Democrat campaign promises do you think will take priority?

GeeMac comments on Nov 12, 2020:

@Admin I disagree with the idea of a “bias” against immigration from “primarily Muslim countries”. The idea of a Trump “Muslim ban” is a hoax that has been continually repeated by the news media. Yes, Trump did restrict travel from Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen, ...

JacksonNought replies on Nov 13, 2020:

Trump himself called it a "Muslim ban" - take it up with him.

Which Democrat campaign promises do you think will take priority?

johnlondon comments on Nov 12, 2020:

Put lgbtxyz in all government positions.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 13, 2020:

What's wrong with having representation?

Somebody PLEASE superchat in TimCastIRL, "The whole Satanic rape and murder of children is a themed ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 12, 2020:

As a Satanist I can assure you, the whole Satanic ritual abuse thing is a moral panic hoax.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 12, 2020:

@A1fredo as an actual Satanist, I think I have more authority to speak on it than you. Yes, there are different sects of Satanism, but the mainstream non-theistic ones are the Church of Satan and The Satanic Temple. Both are equally as valid, though TST is actually recognized in the US and has tax-exempt status. It is not a fraud, and there is not *one* single authority. Ok so you are talking about fetishes. So if a bunch of pedophiles and murderers start cosplaying as Christians, we should just refer to it as Christian take I and murder every time we discuss it? It's also very religiously discriminatory to perpetuate the myth that Satanism involves pedophilia and murder. The Catholic Church has been involved in the largest child abuse scandal, and actually believes in literal cannibalism - the whole "pedophile cannibal murder" trope is inherently Catholic, not Satanic. So maybe in part of your request to comment in TimCast you should help remove that discriminatory bogeyman trope?

Somebody PLEASE superchat in TimCastIRL, "The whole Satanic rape and murder of children is a themed ...

JacksonNought comments on Nov 12, 2020:

As a Satanist I can assure you, the whole Satanic ritual abuse thing is a moral panic hoax.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 12, 2020:

@A1fredo the info isn't "from Netflix" but rather a documentary there called *Hail Satan?* which happens to be hosted on the platform. It follows The Satanic Temple (of which I am a member) and is an authentic source of information. If you are just talking about weird fetishism edge-lords, please don't use the term Satanism - it blames us for despicable crimes.

20.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 11, 2020:

Capitalism is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus Christ.

JacksonNought replies on Nov 12, 2020:

@1914wizard I will say it again. Capitalism is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus Christ. That is pure fact, no amount of word salad can refute that.

LOL there are a few Progressives here that have serious problems.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 11, 2020:

What exactly was wrong with American pre-Trump which needed it to be made "great again"?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 11, 2020:

@Lightman wow, good one. Is this the level of discourse you bring to the table? It's like trying to communicate with a toddler.

LOL there are a few Progressives here that have serious problems.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 11, 2020:

What exactly was wrong with American pre-Trump which needed it to be made "great again"?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 11, 2020:

@Lightman have I said Trump ruined America. Please point out where and when. It's possible, but I'd like you to show me. I have admitted to being a Progressive, sure. That is all. You are the one engaging in strawmen, conjecture, and false narratives.

LOL there are a few Progressives here that have serious problems.

JacksonNought comments on Nov 11, 2020:

What exactly was wrong with American pre-Trump which needed it to be made "great again"?

JacksonNought replies on Nov 11, 2020:

@tracycoyle thank you for your answer. You make good points, and I respect your opinion on the matter. I don't really think Trump or Hillary had what it took to fix any of those issues, especially since I put a lot of the blame on Congress (a lot on McConnell). As for what was good, with Obama I saw the passing of the ACA as a good step in the right direction, albeit flawed with a rough start. Passing marriage equality was huge, as was ending Don't Ask Don't Tell. Bin Laden was brought to justice. Terrible post-9/11 torture practices were ended. EPA and FDA regulations were working towards combating climate change and increasing health standards (though also flawed). Stem-cell research was expanded, and abortion rights were protected. We had a bad recession, but it was in a strong upturn towards recovery. I saw marijuana legalization as a good thing. I think there was a lot of progress made in the way of sexual orientation and gender identity rights. Not all of this was reversed or ruined under Trump. Marriage equality is still legal, though with Thomas and Alito recently opining that *Obergefell v. Hodges* should be overturned, and the recent appointment of Barrett, it could potentially be at risk. I don't necessarily think Trump ruined America, but he did bring a lot of hate and division out of the woodwork, and in my honest opinion he doesn't care about America or its people - just lining his pockets. @Lightman, since when is *asking a question* building a strawman? In fact, it's quite the opposite, since I am trying to see what people think rather than telling them what they think. Did I vote here? Did I say Trump ruined America here? No. But you clearly made this post because of me, I was in your head just that much.